Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(safety_check): set safety condition properly #10307

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2025

Conversation

satoshi-ota
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Set safety condition properly in safety check utils.

Related links

Parent Issue:

None.

How was this PR tested?

I confirmed the flag is_safe became false when I put dummy vehicle near the lane change path in Psim.

image

Notes for reviewers

None.

Interface changes

None.

Effects on system behavior

None.

Signed-off-by: satoshi-ota <satoshi.ota928@gmail.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned) label Mar 19, 2025
Copy link

Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project!

🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode.

Please ensure:

@satoshi-ota satoshi-ota added run:build-and-test-differential Mark to enable build-and-test-differential workflow. (used-by-ci) run:clang-tidy-pr-review labels Mar 19, 2025
@satoshi-ota satoshi-ota merged commit eb1ae1e into autowarefoundation:main Mar 20, 2025
50 of 53 checks passed
@satoshi-ota satoshi-ota deleted the fix/safety-check branch March 20, 2025 01:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned) run:build-and-test-differential Mark to enable build-and-test-differential workflow. (used-by-ci) run:clang-tidy-pr-review
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants