refactor(start_planner): separate debug and info marker for rviz visualization

[kyoichi-sugahara]

Description

Originally, all the start_planner specific information is visualized with the same topic of /planning/scenario_planning/lane_driving/behavior_planning/behavior_path_planner/debug/start_planner.
It becomes cluttered because everything is visualized by just enabling one checkbox as shown in the folloing screenshot.

After categorizing in this PR,

info marker's are

• back_end_pose
• start_pose
• end_pose
• static_collision_check_end_pose
• static_collision_check_end_polygon
• planner_type
• filtered_objects
• predicted_path_for_safety_check
• ego_and_target_polygon_relation
• ego_and_target_polygon_relation_text
• ego_and_target_polygon_relation_cube

debug marker's are

• refined_start_pose
• full_path
• backward_driving_path
• start_pose_candidates
• start_pose_candidates_idx
• shift_path_footprint
• ego_predicted_path_start_planner
• departure_check_lanes_for_shift_pull_out_path
• pull_out_lanes_for_static_objects_collision_check
• object_debug_info

The basic concepts are as follows:

• Info: The purpose of info marker visualization is to visualize information that is helpful in understanding the state and behavior.
• Debug: The purpose of debug visualization is to provide developers with information that is useful in analyzing problems.

Tests performed

Not applicable.

Effects on system behavior

Not applicable.

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[kosuke55]

wooo!! thanks!!!!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 42 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (1121f3b) 14.88% compared to head (208ca0a) 14.88%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
..._start_planner_module/src/start_planner_module.cpp	0.00%	42 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6376      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   14.88%   14.88%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1838     1838              
  Lines      126699   126708       +9     
  Branches    38042    38042              
==========================================
  Hits        18865    18865              
- Misses      86535    86544       +9     
  Partials    21299    21299              

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	0.00% <0.00%> (?)
total	14.89% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️	Carriedforward from 1121f3b

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.