Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(autoware_objects_of_interest_marker_interface): porting from universe to core #168

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 21, 2025

Conversation

liuXinGangChina
Copy link
Contributor

@liuXinGangChina liuXinGangChina commented Jan 15, 2025

We are porting autoware_objects_of_interest_marker_interface to autoware.core, and this PR add the package to core

Description

Related links

Parent Issue:

How was this PR tested?

Notes for reviewers

None.

Interface changes

None.

Effects on system behavior

None.

…verse to core, autoware_objects_of_interest_marker_interface, add this package to core repo and replace universe_utils dependency with autoware_utils dependency: v0.0

Signed-off-by: liuXinGangChina <lxg19892021@gmail.com>
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project!

🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode.

Please ensure:

@liuXinGangChina liuXinGangChina self-assigned this Jan 15, 2025
@liuXinGangChina liuXinGangChina added component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned) run:build-and-test-differential Mark to enable build-and-test-differential workflow. (used-by-ci) labels Jan 15, 2025
…verse to core, autoware_objects_of_interest_marker_interface, fix readme spell issue: v0.1

Signed-off-by: liuXinGangChina <lxg19892021@gmail.com>
@liuXinGangChina liuXinGangChina force-pushed the obj-marker-interface-migration branch from dc55091 to a145d20 Compare January 15, 2025 10:03
…verse to core, autoware_objects_of_interest_marker_interface, update due to the function name change of autoware_utils: v0.2

Signed-off-by: liuXinGangChina <lxg19892021@gmail.com>
@mitsudome-r
Copy link
Member

The modification seems okay, but this must be merged after autowarefoundation/autoware_utils#23

Copy link
Member

@youtalk youtalk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think adding autoware_utils to build_depends.repos will make the CI pass. Other than that, LGTM.

@liuXinGangChina
Copy link
Contributor Author

liuXinGangChina commented Jan 24, 2025

I think adding autoware_utils to build_depends.repos will make the CI pass. Other than that, LGTM.

That‘s right Kondo san @youtalk ,and we do that in this pr
once pr-149 merged we will rebase this pr for merging

Best regrads

心刚

@youtalk
Copy link
Member

youtalk commented Jan 29, 2025

@liuXinGangChina #149 will take some time to merge, so we would like to merge this PR first since it has no external dependencies.

#168 (review)

I think adding autoware_utils to build_depends.repos will make the CI pass. Other than that, LGTM.

…verse to core, autoware_objects_of_interest_marker_interface, add autoware_utils to build.depends, along with internal_msgs which needed by pr-149: v0.2

Signed-off-by: liuXinGangChina <lxg19892021@gmail.com>
@liuXinGangChina liuXinGangChina force-pushed the obj-marker-interface-migration branch from 1b07724 to 79b2532 Compare February 8, 2025 01:45
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 8, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 91 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 53.52%. Comparing base (4cb18f5) to head (dae9362).
Report is 40 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
..._of_interest_marker_interface/src/marker_utils.cpp 0.00% 45 Missing ⚠️
...rface/src/objects_of_interest_marker_interface.cpp 0.00% 35 Missing ⚠️
...ects_of_interest_marker_interface/src/coloring.cpp 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
...interface/objects_of_interest_marker_interface.hpp 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...jects_of_interest_marker_interface/marker_data.hpp 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #168       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   78.75%   53.52%   -25.24%     
===========================================
  Files          11       16        +5     
  Lines         193      284       +91     
  Branches       73       75        +2     
===========================================
  Hits          152      152               
- Misses         11      102       +91     
  Partials       30       30               
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
differential 0.00% <0.00%> (?)
total 78.75% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 4cb18f5

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@liuXinGangChina
Copy link
Contributor Author

@liuXinGangChina #149 will take some time to merge, so we would like to merge this PR first since it has no external dependencies.

#168 (review)

I think adding autoware_utils to build_depends.repos will make the CI pass. Other than that, LGTM.

Kondo san @youtalk

I have add those build depend to the file according to your comment

Have a nice day

心刚

Copy link
Member

@youtalk youtalk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mitsudome-r
Copy link
Member

@liuXinGangChina Could you resolve the conflicts that is occurring on the PR for Universe? autowarefoundation/autoware.universe#9931

@liuXinGangChina
Copy link
Contributor Author

@liuXinGangChina Could you resolve the conflicts that is occurring on the PR for Universe? autowarefoundation/autoware.universe#9931

Sure mits san

@liuXinGangChina
Copy link
Contributor Author

@liuXinGangChina Could you resolve the conflicts that is occurring on the PR for Universe? autowarefoundation/autoware.universe#9931

Sure mits san

Mits san and Kondo san, @mitsudome-r @youtalk

Sorry to bother you on weekend,
I have resolved the conflict with main branch under universe repo in this pr

I checked that modification under universe repo is only about package.xml and CHANGELOG.rst, no need to update this pr under core repo.

图片

Have a nice weekend!

心刚

@mitsudome-r mitsudome-r merged commit 1f47238 into main Feb 21, 2025
24 of 27 checks passed
@mitsudome-r mitsudome-r deleted the obj-marker-interface-migration branch February 21, 2025 01:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:planning Route planning, decision-making, and navigation. (auto-assigned) run:build-and-test-differential Mark to enable build-and-test-differential workflow. (used-by-ci)
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants