Separating invited talks from selected talks

[bcm-at-zama]

As requested in DM by @marcjoyezama

Question: should we also add some new PDFs, eg

• Towards verifiable FHE in practice ([PDF](https://github.com/zama-ai/publications/blob/main/papers/2024/zksummit12.pdf))
  ****Michael Walter
  ****In 12th Zero Knowledge Summit (zkSummit 12), Contributed talk, Lisbon, Portugal, October 8, 2024
• FHE on Ethereum ([PDF](https://github.com/zama-ai/publications/raw/main/papers/2024/PetarIvanov_FHEOnEthereum.pdf))
  ****Petar Ivanov and Clément Danjou
  In 7th Ethereum Community Conference (EthCC 2024), Contributed talk, Brussels, Belgium, July 8-11, 2024
• Advanced FHE and MPC protocols for the blockchain ([PDF](https://github.com/zama-ai/publications/raw/main/papers/2024/TPMPC.pdf))
  ****Kelong Cong, Morten Dahl, Clément Danjou, Daniel Demmler, Tore Frederiksen, Petar Ivanov, Marc Joye, Benoît Libert, Dragos Rotaru, Nigel P. Smart, Titouan Tanguy, and Louis Tremblay Thibault
  In Theory and Practice of Multi-Party Computation Workshop (TPMPC 2024), Contributed talk, Darmstadt, Germany, June 3-6, 2024
• Updatable privacy-preserving blueprints ([PDF](https://eprint.iacr.org/2023/1787.pdf))
  ****Bernardo David, Felix Engelmann, Tore Frederiksen, Markulf Kohlweiss, Elena Pagnin, and Mikhail Volkhov
  In Workshop on Cryptographic Tools for Blockchains (CTB 2024), Contributed talk, Zürich, Switzerland, May 25, 2024

per this page?

[yuxizama]

The categorization is so clear to me, inside the "invited talks" there are many Zama hosted event.
What was the original idea of the separation?

Question: should we also add some new PDFs, eg

Yes we can add them!

[bcm-at-zama]

Comes from a DM from @marcjoyezama. Maybe Marc can comment?

Marc wanted to make a distinction between "what was reviewed / accepted by a program commitee" and "what is just invited talks or self-hosted talks", I would say

[yuxizama]

@bcm-at-zama I've implemented changed in this PR: #65
Closing this one.