-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: add blockage for xx1 #191
fix: add blockage for xx1 #191
Conversation
Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>
Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>
Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>
512e1c9
to
4748c45
Compare
@@ -24,6 +25,12 @@ | |||
<arg name="vehicle_mirror_param_file" value="$(var vehicle_mirror_param_file)"/> | |||
<arg name="use_pointcloud_container" value="$(var use_pointcloud_container)"/> | |||
<arg name="container_name" value="$(var pointcloud_container_name)"/> | |||
<arg name="angle_range" value="[0.0, 360.0]"/> | |||
<arg name="vertical_bins" value="128"/> | |||
<arg name="horizontal_ring_id" value="64"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@miursh
As confirmation in Rviz, the velodyne ring IDs are arranged in the order as the assumption of the current algorithm that ring_id will be whether Top to Bottom or Bottom to Top.
In VLS128 the order is from the bottom.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@badai-nguyen
Ah, I see. Understood.
However, is 64 is really horizontal?
Typically, there are more downward-facing lasers than upward-facing ones, so I doubt that the center would be horizontal.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@miursh Thank you for your comment.
Currently, I checked on the kind of empty environment and I think 64 is acceptable.
I think it also could be adjusted if any feedback after the function is enabled for operation.
Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>
Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>
@badai-nguyen Could you resolve conflicts? |
Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>
Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>
@miursh @kyoichi-sugahara Since the nebula azimuth correction bug still under investigation, so I change the default of xx1 blockage to Here is CI test result: https://evaluation.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/44e36320-0062-5b34-9533-968fec2a958b?project_id=prd_jt |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp>
@kyoichi-sugahara As our internal discusion, I also added the parameters for velodyne_xxx.launch.xml to make it more clearly here 57612b6 |
@kyoichi-sugahara I have separated aip_x2_launch's parameters into PR #223 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
* fix: enable blocakge diag for xx1 Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp> * fix: xx1 launch Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp> * fix: x2 launch Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp> * ci(pre-commit): autofix * fix: remove duplicated angle_range param Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp> * fix: remove x2 redundant param Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp> * chore: update config file Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp> * chore: disable xx1 blockage as default Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp> * fix: velodyne launch Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp> * Revert "fix: remove x2 redundant param" This reverts commit fa93588. * Revert "fix: x2 launch" This reverts commit 4748c45. --------- Signed-off-by: badai-nguyen <dai.nguyen@tier4.jp> Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This to update aip_launch param as change in autowarefoundation/autoware.universe#5932 and enable blockage_diag for xx1.