-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Vendor Bitcoin Core v23.2 #85
Vendor Bitcoin Core v23.2 #85
Conversation
Lol, a different variant of the same bug. I wonder if there's a newer version of the s390x image we could be using? Or a different big-endian box? I seem to remember Github discontinuing s390x many years ago.. I'm surprised this is still running for us. |
Yeah I had a bit of a scout around and didn't see one - I can look harder though. |
For now I think we should just mark this CI job as optional :/. Let's get caught up with Core and then revisit this rather than having this open loop where we're struggling to deal with old code on old CI boxes and unable to move forward. |
Let's go! |
fbd3bcc
to
16569fb
Compare
Run the vendoring script: `./contrib/vendor-bitcoin-core.sh v23.2`
16569fb
to
1b8dd2e
Compare
Gentle bump, can you take a look at this one please @apoelstra. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK 1b8dd2e
Is this queued up for merge today @apoelstra ? |
Run the vendoring script:
./contrib/vendor-bitcoin-core.sh v23.2