Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use ephemeral ports in proxy tests #13234

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 23, 2025

Conversation

sbidoul
Copy link
Member

@sbidoul sbidoul commented Feb 23, 2025

This fixes a source of CI instability.

Yes I've seen "address already in use" in CI, and I happen to be in a mood to fix this :)

@sbidoul sbidoul added skip news Does not need a NEWS file entry (eg: trivial changes) type: maintenance Related to Development and Maintenance Processes labels Feb 23, 2025
This is to avoid "address already in use" errors when running tests concurrently.
@sbidoul sbidoul force-pushed the proxy-tests-ephemeral-ports-sbi branch from 9bbc9ce to cbf2d30 Compare February 23, 2025 11:42
Copy link
Member

@ichard26 ichard26 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@ichard26
Copy link
Member

I can easily reproduce the OSError: [Errno 98] Address already in use locally and this patch does fix it.

@ichard26 ichard26 merged commit ae1b526 into pypa:main Feb 23, 2025
31 checks passed
@ichard26
Copy link
Member

I assume that you saw the CI error while taking a look at #13228 :)

@sbidoul sbidoul deleted the proxy-tests-ephemeral-ports-sbi branch February 23, 2025 17:03
@sbidoul
Copy link
Member Author

sbidoul commented Feb 23, 2025

I assume that you saw the CI error while taking a look at #13228 :)

Ah no, that was when doing #13232.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip news Does not need a NEWS file entry (eg: trivial changes) type: maintenance Related to Development and Maintenance Processes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants