Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Encapsulate device connection behaviour #1836

Draft
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

joshk
Copy link
Collaborator

@joshk joshk commented Jan 27, 2025

This PR is a foundational step towards NervesHub supporting different device transport backends.

The logic for device connections has been better encapsulated in a new module, DeviceLink.Connections. The DeviceLink namespace is intended to be used for further behaviour expansion.

These focused modules are easier to test and clearer to understand.

The next steps are to work through the various channel modules and apply a similar pattern.

@joshk joshk force-pushed the a-device-proxy-rpc-experiment branch 2 times, most recently from fe132cc to a25889f Compare January 27, 2025 07:57
@nshoes
Copy link
Contributor

nshoes commented Jan 28, 2025

👁️ 👃 👁️

Is this just organizational work or are we changing behavior as well?

@joshk joshk force-pushed the a-device-proxy-rpc-experiment branch from d2bee7b to 33c9cd4 Compare January 29, 2025 03:02
@joshk joshk changed the title A Device Proxy experiment : some foundational work Encapsulate device connection behaviour Jan 29, 2025
@joshk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

joshk commented Jan 29, 2025

👁️ 👃 👁️

Is this just organizational work or are we changing behavior as well?

This isn't changing any behavior. Not one test is changed, all tests are passing.

This is more organizationally focused, leading up to a bigger set of work focused on enabling different device transports (websocket proxy, mqtt, )

@joshk joshk force-pushed the a-device-proxy-rpc-experiment branch from 5b2512c to 5ea42e1 Compare January 30, 2025 02:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants