Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Toggle on Slack User ETL & Toggle Off "Customers" ETL #59

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 20, 2024

Conversation

jeffwecan
Copy link
Collaborator

I forget exactly why I added this customer ETL. I think it was intended to merge membership orders across users that mapped to the same member but were under different email addresses. At this point, I'm not confident that the logic involved is sound and I'm certain that it breaks our worker service when there are multiple users, for the same member, but differing emails. So I'm proposing we leave it toggled off for the time being.

Slack users ETL has been cleared of any wrongdoing for now 😄

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (a9f234d) 76.31% compared to head (5c2938e) 76.31%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #59   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.31%   76.31%           
=======================================
  Files          32       32           
  Lines        2862     2862           
=======================================
  Hits         2184     2184           
  Misses        678      678           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jeffwecan jeffwecan merged commit b5d7af0 into main Feb 20, 2024
10 checks passed
@jeffwecan jeffwecan deleted the scheduler_jobs_tweakz branch February 20, 2024 21:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant