-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
support generics and forward references #272
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️
Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.30
.
Benchmark suite | Current: b20329c | Previous: 1cdc3ef | Ratio |
---|---|---|---|
tests/performance/test_from_dict.py::test_casting |
140328.6592434538 iter/sec (stddev: 0.0000020240917045147896 ) |
184957.82267943013 iter/sec (stddev: 5.927125345458689e-7 ) |
1.32 |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
@avlonder any idea for a better exception message in |
What about an f-string "Ambiguous TypeVar {var_name}"? |
I guess that could do! Thanks for all the contributions, I'll release 1.9.0 in the upcoming days :) |
Closes #131 #160 #250
To close #259