Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

wip: attempts at caching Maven local repo #4667

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dduportal
Copy link
Contributor

@dduportal dduportal commented Mar 8, 2025

Ref. jenkins-infra/helpdesk#4525

this PR is currently a playground (hence the draft + WiP status) to evaluate if the caching through the S3 PVC is worth it

@dduportal dduportal changed the title wip: first attempt at caching for prep stage wip: attempts at caching Maven local repo Mar 8, 2025
@MarkEWaite
Copy link
Contributor

I would love it if you would be willing to include the JGit 7.2 and Mina SSHD 2.15.0 changes from:

Also no problem if you don't include it, but it would help me know that the changes in those two pull requests are not harmful

@dduportal dduportal force-pushed the add-cacher-pipeline branch 3 times, most recently from 42dc96d to e7ef75a Compare March 9, 2025 09:51
Signed-off-by: Damien Duportal <damien.duportal@gmail.com>
@dduportal dduportal force-pushed the add-cacher-pipeline branch 2 times, most recently from 05aa8c0 to e452d57 Compare March 9, 2025 17:04
Signed-off-by: Damien Duportal <damien.duportal@gmail.com>
…ilable limit (JVM relies on cgroups v2)

Signed-off-by: Damien Duportal <damien.duportal@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Damien Duportal <damien.duportal@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Damien Duportal <damien.duportal@gmail.com>
@dduportal
Copy link
Contributor Author

I would love it if you would be willing to include the JGit 7.2 and Mina SSHD 2.15.0 changes from:

* [Test Mina SSHD 2.15.0 and JGit 7.2.0 #4663](https://github.com/jenkinsci/bom/pull/4663)

Also no problem if you don't include it, but it would help me know that the changes in those two pull requests are not harmful

I'm not sure to understand your request @MarkEWaite ?
The goal of the PR here is to build a PoC for loading some part of the cache and validate it has no regression using it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants