Remove empty format precision specifier #16
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
A format precision specifier consisting of a dot and no number actually does nothing and has no specified meaning. Currently this is silently ignored, but it may turn into a warning or error. See rust-lang/rust#131159 and rust-lang/rust#136638
|
BTW Here's a log of the crater run that detected this, where you can see what the effect of the proposed stricter detection is: https://crater-reports.s3.amazonaws.com/pr-136638/try%2377e966048a5976133ba6b8f26d38d558f2a84355/reg/yaxpeax-arm-0.3.0/log.txt |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A format precision specifier consisting of a dot and no number actually does nothing and has no specified meaning. Currently this is silently ignored, but it may turn into a warning or error.
See rust-lang/rust#131159 and rust-lang/rust#136638
Please leave a comment there if you have any opinion about this. If you remember why this was written this way that could help improve the diagnostics rustc gives.