Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IPEX XPU 2.3.110 support #378

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024
Merged

IPEX XPU 2.3.110 support #378

merged 8 commits into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

sramakintel
Copy link
Contributor

@sramakintel sramakintel commented Sep 11, 2024

Description

The PR adds support to updated IPEX XPU stack for 2.3.110 version.

Related Issue

https://jira.devtools.intel.com/browse/MLOPS-2127

Changes Made

  • The code follows the project's coding standards.
  • No Intel Internal IP is present within the changes.
  • The documentation has been updated to reflect any changes in functionality.

Validation

  • I have tested any changes in container groups locally with test_runner.py with all existing tests passing, and I have added new tests where applicable.
Logs attached

output_logs.zip

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 11, 2024

Dependency Review

The following issues were found:
  • ✅ 0 vulnerable package(s)
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with incompatible licenses
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions
  • ⚠️ 5 package(s) with unknown licenses.
See the Details below.

License Issues

pytorch/serving/torchserve-xpu-requirements.txt

PackageVersionLicenseIssue Type
intel_extension_for_pytorch2.3.110+xpuNullUnknown License
torch2.3.1+cxx11.abiNullUnknown License

pytorch/xpu-requirements.txt

PackageVersionLicenseIssue Type
intel_extension_for_pytorch2.3.110+xpuNullUnknown License
oneccl_bind_pt2.3.100+xpuNullUnknown License
torch2.3.1+cxx11.abiNullUnknown License

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails
pip/intel_extension_for_pytorch 2.3.110+xpu UnknownUnknown
pip/torch 2.3.1+cxx11.abi 🟢 6.4
Details
CheckScoreReason
Binary-Artifacts🟢 9binaries present in source code
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
CI-Tests⚠️ -1no pull request found
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no badge detected
Code-Review🟢 10all last 30 commits are reviewed through Prow
Contributors🟢 1035 different organizations found -- score normalized to 10
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Dependency-Update-Tool⚠️ 0no update tool detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
License🟢 10license file detected
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) out of 30 and 15 issue activity out of 30 found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Packaging⚠️ -1no published package detected
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
SAST⚠️ 0no SAST tool detected
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ 00 out of 5 artifacts are signed -- score normalized to 0
Token-Permissions⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Vulnerabilities🟢 10no vulnerabilities detected
Webhooks⚠️ -1check is not supported for this request: SCORECARD_V6 is not set, not running the Webhook check
pip/torchaudio 2.3.1+cxx11.abi 🟢 5.3
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 10all changesets reviewed
Maintained🟢 54 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during GetBranch(release/2.1): error during branchesHandler.query: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
pip/torchvision 0.18.1+cxx11.abi 🟢 5
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 3Found 10/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during GetBranch(release/0.16): error during branchesHandler.query: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 9binaries present in source code
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
pip/intel_extension_for_pytorch 2.3.110+xpu UnknownUnknown
pip/oneccl_bind_pt 2.3.100+xpu UnknownUnknown
pip/torch 2.3.1+cxx11.abi 🟢 6.4
Details
CheckScoreReason
Binary-Artifacts🟢 9binaries present in source code
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
CI-Tests⚠️ -1no pull request found
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no badge detected
Code-Review🟢 10all last 30 commits are reviewed through Prow
Contributors🟢 1035 different organizations found -- score normalized to 10
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Dependency-Update-Tool⚠️ 0no update tool detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
License🟢 10license file detected
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) out of 30 and 15 issue activity out of 30 found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Packaging⚠️ -1no published package detected
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
SAST⚠️ 0no SAST tool detected
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ 00 out of 5 artifacts are signed -- score normalized to 0
Token-Permissions⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Vulnerabilities🟢 10no vulnerabilities detected
Webhooks⚠️ -1check is not supported for this request: SCORECARD_V6 is not set, not running the Webhook check
pip/torchaudio 2.3.1+cxx11.abi 🟢 5.3
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 10all changesets reviewed
Maintained🟢 54 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 5
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during GetBranch(release/2.1): error during branchesHandler.query: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
pip/torchvision 0.18.1+cxx11.abi 🟢 5
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 3Found 10/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 3
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 18 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
License🟢 10license file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during GetBranch(release/0.16): error during branchesHandler.query: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 9binaries present in source code
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0

Scanned Manifest Files

pytorch/serving/torchserve-xpu-requirements.txt
  • setuptools@69.5.1
  • torch@2.1.0.post3+cxx11.abi
  • intel_extension_for_pytorch@2.3.110+xpu
  • torch@2.3.1+cxx11.abi
  • torchaudio@2.3.1+cxx11.abi
  • torchvision@0.18.1+cxx11.abi
  • intel_extension_for_pytorch@2.1.40+xpu
  • torchaudio@2.1.0.post3+cxx11.abi
  • torchvision@0.16.0.post3+cxx11.abi
pytorch/xpu-requirements.txt
  • setuptools@69.5.1
  • torch@2.1.0.post3+cxx11.abi
  • intel_extension_for_pytorch@2.3.110+xpu
  • oneccl_bind_pt@2.3.100+xpu
  • torch@2.3.1+cxx11.abi
  • torchaudio@2.3.1+cxx11.abi
  • torchvision@0.18.1+cxx11.abi
  • intel_extension_for_pytorch@2.1.40+xpu
  • oneccl_bind_pt@2.1.400+xpu
  • torchaudio@2.1.0.post3+cxx11.abi
  • torchvision@0.16.0.post3+cxx11.abi

@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

Copy link
Contributor

@tylertitsworth tylertitsworth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Small Nits

sramakintel and others added 7 commits September 11, 2024 13:45
Signed-off-by: Srikanth Ramakrishna <srikanth.ramakrishna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Srikanth Ramakrishna <srikanth.ramakrishna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Srikanth Ramakrishna <srikanth.ramakrishna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Srikanth Ramakrishna <srikanth.ramakrishna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Srikanth Ramakrishna <srikanth.ramakrishna@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Tyler Titsworth <tyler.titsworth@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Srikanth Ramakrishna  <srikanth.ramakrishna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Srikanth Ramakrishna <srikanth.ramakrishna@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Tyler Titsworth <tyler.titsworth@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Srikanth Ramakrishna  <srikanth.ramakrishna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Srikanth Ramakrishna <srikanth.ramakrishna@intel.com>
@sramakintel sramakintel force-pushed the sramakr1/ipex_xpu_2.3.110 branch from 8f8aa35 to 94607ba Compare September 11, 2024 20:45
Signed-off-by: Srikanth Ramakrishna <srikanth.ramakrishna@intel.com>
@tylertitsworth tylertitsworth merged commit e4a0073 into main Sep 11, 2024
51 of 53 checks passed
@tylertitsworth tylertitsworth deleted the sramakr1/ipex_xpu_2.3.110 branch September 11, 2024 21:42
tylertitsworth pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 25, 2024
Signed-off-by: Srikanth Ramakrishna <srikanth.ramakrishna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Srikanth Ramakrishna  <srikanth.ramakrishna@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Tyler Titsworth <tyler.titsworth@intel.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants