test: add another v-function in local-env #477
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
LGLO
reviewed
Feb 7, 2025
| @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | |||
| { | |||
| "type": "PlutusScriptV2", | |||
| "description": "V-function that allows to release one token each minute since 2025-01-01 00:00 UTC (timestamp 1735689600)", | |||
| "description": "V-function that allows to release one token each minute since 1975-07-02 21:36 UTC (timestamp 000173568960)", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh boy, I wish it was a fix in the function body, not in the description
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm automating some e2e tests for it. I'll probably add more v-functions and replace that with 01-01-2025 date
LGLO
reviewed
Feb 7, 2025
| @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ echo "Permissioned candidates policy ID: $PERMISSIONED_CANDIDATES_POLICY_ID" | |||
| echo "Setting values for NATIVE_TOKEN_POLICY_ID, NATIVE_TOKEN_ASSET_NAME, and ILLIQUID_SUPPLY_VALIDATOR_ADDRESS for chain-spec creation" | |||
| export NATIVE_TOKEN_POLICY_ID="1fab25f376bc49a181d03a869ee8eaa3157a3a3d242a619ca7995b2b" | |||
| export NATIVE_TOKEN_ASSET_NAME="52657761726420746f6b656e" | |||
| export ILLIQUID_SUPPLY_VALIDATOR_ADDRESS="addr_test1wpy8ewg646rg4ce78nl3aassmkquf4wlxcaugqlxwzcylkca0q8v3" | |||
| export ILLIQUID_SUPPLY_VALIDATOR_ADDRESS="addr_test1wq0mnff9xtddgxx8wjxt8sx68gxvf06yy2c60tqdgsp8ydsgvu7hq" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is it because genesis_utxo changed?
LGLO
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2025
LGLO
reviewed
Feb 7, 2025
| @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | |||
| { | |||
| "type": "PlutusScriptV2", | |||
| "description": "V-function that allows to release one token each minute since 2025-02-07 10:46 UTC (timestamp 1738925213000)", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can we use something round, like 1st Feb, to make calculations easier? After all humans are supposed to use this setup. If this is only for E2E, then it should be moved there.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sure, I'll move it then
AmbientTea
approved these changes
Feb 11, 2025
rsporny
force-pushed
the
new-v-function-to-test-update-settings
branch
2 times, most recently
from
eb398a3 to
b7bf26f
Compare
adds: - new `v-function-updated.script` that enables testing of `./partner-chains-node smart-contracts reserve update-settings` command
rsporny
force-pushed
the
new-v-function-to-test-update-settings
branch
from
b7bf26f to
5223915
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
adds:
v-function-updated.scriptthat enables testing of./partner-chains-node smart-contracts reserve update-settingscommand