Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pin Pytorch 2.2 in IPEX Tests #688

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 25, 2024
Merged

Pin Pytorch 2.2 in IPEX Tests #688

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 25, 2024

Conversation

IlyasMoutawwakil
Copy link
Member

What does this PR do?

Until a compatible ipex is released.

Before submitting

  • This PR fixes a typo or improves the docs (you can dismiss the other checks if that's the case).
  • Did you make sure to update the documentation with your changes?
  • Did you write any new necessary tests?

@IlyasMoutawwakil IlyasMoutawwakil changed the title pin torch Pin Pytorch 2.2 Apr 25, 2024
@HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev

The docs for this PR live here. All of your documentation changes will be reflected on that endpoint. The docs are available until 30 days after the last update.

@helena-intel
Copy link
Collaborator

OpenVINO tests pass with PyTorch 2.3 ( https://github.com/huggingface/optimum-intel/actions/runs/8821417491/job/24217231927 ). @eaidova do you know of any issues with OpenVINO and PyTorch 2.3? If there are no issues with OpenVINO the PyTorch version should be limited only in the INC/IPEX extra.

@IlyasMoutawwakil IlyasMoutawwakil changed the title Pin Pytorch 2.2 Pin Pytorch 2.2 in IPEX Tests Apr 25, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@echarlaix echarlaix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@echarlaix echarlaix merged commit 4bee0c7 into main Apr 25, 2024
12 checks passed
@echarlaix echarlaix deleted the pin-torch-2.2 branch April 25, 2024 09:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants