incorporate lrhn review

src/content/language/records.md

@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ recordAB = recordXY; // OK.
 ```
 
 This is similar to how positional parameters
-in a function declaration or function typedef
+in a [function declaration or function typedef][function-type]
 can have names but those names don't affect the signature of the function.
 
 For more information and examples, check out 
@@ -226,25 +226,16 @@ parallelization of futures of different types, which you can read about in the
 
 ## Records as simple data structures
 
-The provided example illustrates how developers can leverage this pattern to
-define dynamic UI widgets in a type-safe manner, similar to interfaces in
-TypeScript but without the overhead of classes. This approach is particularly
-useful for scenarios where simplicity and reusability are prioritized.
+Records only hold data. When that's all you need,
+they're immediately available and easy to use 
+without needing to declare any new classes.
+For a simple list of data tuples that all have the same shape,
+a *list of records* is the most direct representation.
 
-```dart
-typedef ButtonItem = ({
-  String label,
-  Widget? icon,
-  void Function()? onPressed,
-});
-```
-
-Here is an example about using `record` and `typedef` as structure of dynamic UI
-widgets render:
+Take this list of "button definitions", for example:
 
 ```dart
-// Define list from `buttonItem` interface.
-List<ButtonItem> buttons = [
+final buttons = [
   (
     label: "Button I",
     icon: const Icon(Icons.upload_file),
@@ -256,28 +247,105 @@ List<ButtonItem> buttons = [
     onPressed: () => print("Action -> Button II"),
   )
 ];
+```
+
+This code can be written directly without needing any additional declarations.
+
+### Records and typedefs
+
+You can choose to use [typedefs][] to give the record type itself a name,
+and use that rather than writing out the full record type.
+This method allows you to state that some fields can be null (`?`),
+even if none of the current entries in the list have a null value.
+
+```dart
+typedef ButtonItem = ({String label, Icon icon, void Function()? onPressed});
+final List<ButtonItem> buttons = [
+  // ...
+];
+```
+
+Because record types are structural types, giving a name like `ButtonItem`
+only introduces an alias that makes it easier to refer to the structural type: 
+`({String label, Icon icon, void Function()? onPressed})`.
+
+Having all your code refer to a record type by its alias makes it easier to
+later change the record's implementation without needing to update every reference.
+
+Code can work with the given button definitions the same way it would
+with simple class instances:
+
+```dart
+  List<Container> widget = [
+    for (var button in buttons)
+      Container(
+        margin: const EdgeInsets.all(4.0),
+        child: OutlinedButton.icon(
+          onPressed: button.onPressed,
+          icon: button.icon,
+          label: Text(button.label),
+        ),
+      ),
+  ];
+```
+
+You could even decide to later change the record type to a class type to add methods:
+
+```dart
+class ButtonItem {
+  final String label;
+  final Icon icon;
+  final void Function()? onPressed;
+  ButtonItem({required this.label, required this.icon, this.onPressed});
+  bool get hasOnpressed => onPressed != null;
+}
+```
+
+Or to an [extension type][]:
+
+```dart
+extension type ButtonItem._(({String label, Icon icon, void Function()? onPressed}) _) {
+  String get label => _.label;
+  Icon get icon => _.icon;
+  void Function()? get onPressed => _.onPressed;
+  ButtonItem({required String label, required Icon icon, void Function()? onPressed})
+      : this._((label: label, icon: icon, onPressed: onPressed));
+  bool get hasOnpressed => _.onPressed != null;
+}
+```
 
-List<Container> widget = buttons.map(
-  (ButtonItem button) => Container(
-    margin: const EdgeInsets.all(4.0),
-    child: OutlinedButton.icon(
-      onPressed: button.onPressed,
-      icon: button.icon!,
-      label: Text(button.label),
-    ),
+And then create the list of button definitions using that type's constructors:
+
+```dart
+final List<ButtonItem> buttons =  [
+  ButtonItem(
+    label: "Button I",
+    icon: const Icon(Icons.upload_file),
+    onPressed: () => print("Action -> Button I"),
+  ),
+  ButtonItem(
+    label: "Button II",
+    icon: const Icon(Icons.info),
+    onPressed: () => print("Action -> Button II"),
   )
-)
-.toList();
+];
 ```
 
-The example demonstrates how to define a `ButtonItem` structure using records
-and `typedef`, which promotes cleaner and more maintainable code by adhering to
-the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle.
+Again, all while not needing to change the code that uses that list.
+
+Changing any type does require the code using it to be very careful about
+not making assumptions. A type alias does not offer any protection or guarantee
+for the code using it that the value is a record.
+Extension types, also, offer little protection.
+Only a class can provide full abstraction and control over access to its state.
 
 [language version]: /resources/language/evolution#language-versioning
 [collection types]: /language/collections
 [pattern]: /language/patterns#destructuring-multiple-returns
 [`dart:async` documentation]: /libraries/dart-async#handling-errors-for-multiple-futures
 [parameters and arguments]: /language/functions#parameters
+[function-type]: /language/functions#function-types
 [destructure]: /language/patterns#destructuring
 [Pattern types]: /language/pattern-types#record
+[typedefs]: /language/typedefs
+[extension type]: /language/extension-types