Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Github issue #359 #361

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2024
Merged

Github issue #359 #361

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2024

Conversation

amirhosv
Copy link
Contributor

@amirhosv amirhosv commented Feb 6, 2024

Issue #359

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@amirhosv amirhosv marked this pull request as ready for review February 7, 2024 02:40
@amirhosv amirhosv requested a review from a team as a code owner February 7, 2024 02:40
@@ -669,6 +669,15 @@ add_custom_target(check-junit-AesGcmEager

DEPENDS accp-jar tests-jar)

add_custom_target(check-junit-DifferentTempDir
Copy link
Contributor

@geedo0 geedo0 Feb 7, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not convinced that this is a high signal test. There's no assertion anywhere that a different tmpdir was actually used. Just that these two tests (also, just 1 is sufficient) succeeded when this property was set. I'm inclined to drop this test target.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll drop it in the next patch.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since the PR already has the two approvals, I'll drop this in another PR.

@amirhosv amirhosv merged commit 8f13f2d into corretto:main Feb 21, 2024
10 checks passed
@amirhosv amirhosv deleted the tmpdir branch February 21, 2024 13:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants