fix: to fetch booking with user as attendee in bookings list (user) filter

[vijayraghav-io]

What does this PR do?

• Fixes [CAL-5181] For org admins, we don't consider bookings as attendee for the user in bookings list #19333
• Fixes CAL-5181

Mandatory Tasks (DO NOT REMOVE)

• I have self-reviewed the code (A decent size PR without self-review might be rejected).
• -N/A - I have updated the developer docs in /docs if this PR makes changes that would require a documentation change. If N/A, write N/A here and check the checkbox.
• I confirm automated tests are in place that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.

[vercel]

@vijayraghav-io is attempting to deploy a commit to the cal Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[graphite-app]

Graphite Automations

"Add consumer team as reviewer" took an action on this PR • (02/19/25)

1 reviewer was added to this PR based on Keith Williams's automation.

"Add community label" took an action on this PR • (02/19/25)

1 label was added to this PR based on Keith Williams's automation.

[vijayraghav-io]

Creation of E2E tests in process

[vijayraghav-io]

added E2E test

[eunjae-lee]

Hey @vijayraghav-io Actually I have a big refactoring PR #19369 regarding this area, which conflicts. I've just applied your change over there, and I think your test case will be really helpful. I will also move it over there and see if my PR still works with your test case. Thanks for the work!

[vijayraghav-io]

Hey @vijayraghav-io Actually I have a big refactoring PR #19369 regarding this area, which conflicts. I've just applied your change over there, and I think your test case will be really helpful. I will also move it over there and see if my PR still works with your test case. Thanks for the work!

@eunjae-lee , Thanks! for letting me know.

saw my changes in your new PR.
So, the test case should still work fine.
I couldn't see the test yet, hopefully you are yet to add.
Or let me know after you merge, i can include only the test case here.

[eunjae-lee]

Hey @vijayraghav-io Actually I have a big refactoring PR #19369 regarding this area, which conflicts. I've just applied your change over there, and I think your test case will be really helpful. I will also move it over there and see if my PR still works with your test case. Thanks for the work!

@eunjae-lee , Thanks! for letting me know.

saw my changes in your new PR. So, the test case should still work fine. I couldn't see the test yet, hopefully you are yet to add. Or let me know after you merge, i can include only the test case here.

I'm going to add it and test, and then push the commit by today. Thank you :)