Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add test cases to validate caching in operational level #1726

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Jan 30, 2024

Conversation

Nuvindu
Copy link
Contributor

@Nuvindu Nuvindu commented Jan 27, 2024

Purpose

$subject

Checklist

  • Operation-level Cache Test
    • Caching

      • Simple field level caching
        • Caching with records
        • Caching with service objects
        • Caching with service object/record arrays
        • Caching with union types
        • Caching with dataloader
        • Caching with errors
        • Caching with partial data responses
        • Caching with input object parameters
        • Caching with nullable inputs
        • Caching with list inputs
        • Cache max size exceeding
        • Caching with interceptors
      • Cache Eviction
        • Simple field level cache eviction
        • Cache eviction with records
        • Cache eviction with service objects
        • Cache eviction with service object/record arrays
        • Cache eviction with union types
        • Cache eviction with dataloader
        • Cache eviction with partial data responses
        • Test automatic cache eviction.(TTL completion)
        • Test cache eviction API invalidateAll()

Copy link

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

@DimuthuMadushan DimuthuMadushan merged commit c7cb2ab into ballerina-platform:cache Jan 30, 2024
2 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants