Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📬 Issue #, if available:
N/A
✍️ Description of changes:
This is something I noticed from reading the code, but not a behavior that I have directly observed.
The panic layer contains the following code for extracting a message from a panic:
I believe that this will lose the message when the panic payload is not an
&str
.Consider the following example:
This prints:
If this were to happen in lambda code I believe that only the second case would be correctly handled by the panic layer.
In the most typical case of
panic!("message")
, the payload will be an&'static str
, but if formatting is used you will get aString
instead, which can not be extracted via.downcast_ref<&str>()
. Moreover, the panic payload can be any arbitrary type conforming to'static + Any + Send
, viapanic_any()
, although this is rare and there isn't much that can be done in this case anyway.By adding an additional branch to downcast to
String
, we ensure that we capture the error message in most cases. This also better aligns us with the standard library's implementation.🔏 By submitting this pull request
cargo +nightly fmt
.cargo clippy --fix
.