Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scope legacy plugin wallets to prior adapter versions #822

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

0xmaayan
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Following aptos-labs/aptos-wallet-adapter#464 , the new adapter version now only supports AIP-62 wallets (i.e no legacy plugin wallets)

  • If any existing pages were renamed or removed:
    • Were redirects added to next.config.mjs?
    • Did you update any relative links that pointed to the renamed / removed pages?
  • Do all Lints pass?
    • Have you ran pnpm fmt?
    • Have you ran pnpm lint?

@0xmaayan 0xmaayan requested review from gregnazario and a team as code owners February 19, 2025 21:47
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 19, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
developer-docs-nextra ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 19, 2025 10:12pm

Copy link
Collaborator

@gregnazario gregnazario left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shall we also deprecate the template?

@0xmaayan 0xmaayan merged commit d001bb4 into main Feb 19, 2025
6 checks passed
@0xmaayan 0xmaayan deleted the update_wallet_Adapter_docs branch February 19, 2025 22:17
@0xmaayan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Shall we also deprecate the template?

hmm what template?

@gregnazario
Copy link
Collaborator

Shall we also deprecate the template?

hmm what template?

https://github.com/aptos-labs/wallet-adapter-plugin-template

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants