Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FINERACT-2176: fix Interest portion is missing from Charge-off transaction #4338

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

magyari-adam
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Describe the changes made and why they were made.

Ignore if these details are present on the associated Apache Fineract JIRA ticket.

Checklist

Please make sure these boxes are checked before submitting your pull request - thanks!

  • Write the commit message as per https://github.com/apache/fineract/#pull-requests

  • Acknowledge that we will not review PRs that are not passing the build ("green") - it is your responsibility to get a proposed PR to pass the build, not primarily the project's maintainers.

  • Create/update unit or integration tests for verifying the changes made.

  • Follow coding conventions at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Coding+Conventions.

  • Add required Swagger annotation and update API documentation at fineract-provider/src/main/resources/static/legacy-docs/apiLive.htm with details of any API changes

  • Submission is not a "code dump". (Large changes can be made "in repository" via a branch. Ask on the developer mailing list for guidance, if required.)

FYI our guidelines for code reviews are at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FINERACT/Code+Review+Guide.

penaltychargesPortion = penaltychargesPortion
.plus(currentInstallment.getPenaltyChargesOutstanding(transactionCtx.getCurrency()));
}
principalPortion = principalPortion.plus(currentInstallment.getPrincipalOutstanding(transactionCtx.getCurrency()));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@magyari-adam I am not sure about this. If an installment is fully paid, there cannot be any outstanding, so removing this condition looks incorrect to me, no?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In case of early repayment with zero interest after charge-off and interest reclaculation enabled, we (re)calculate the remaining interest portion on the installment where it would belong date wise, then blindly set the interest after the charge-off date to 0, and don't consider unrecognized interest there. In all other cases fully paid installments should have 0 outstanding so this shouldn't affect those.

@magyari-adam magyari-adam marked this pull request as ready for review February 25, 2025 12:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants