-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 455
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Recreate TabletsMetadata iterator when file ranges are not contiguous #5341
Open
dlmarion
wants to merge
5
commits into
apache:2.1
Choose a base branch
from
dlmarion:5201-targeted-metadata-scans
base: 2.1
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0ec8982
Recreate TabletsMetadata iterator when file ranges are not contiguous
dlmarion 50baf8a
Only create TabletsMetadata iterator when TabletsMetadata changes
dlmarion 30d944b
Close TabletsMetadata object in PrepBulkImport
dlmarion ec9fa65
Merge branch '2.1' into 5201-targeted-metadata-scans
dlmarion 444ad46
Merge branch '2.1' into 5201-targeted-metadata-scans
dlmarion File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In some case this strategy could potentially make performance worse, like the case of importing into every 3rd tablet. The underlying scanner has already made an RPC and fetched some number of key values. Not sure of the best way to do this, but ideally we would only reset the scanner if the needed data is not already sitting in that batch of key values that was already read.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wondering if using a batch scanner would be better here to minimize the overall number of RPCs made. Would be a large change to the code. The current code, even if we optimize the use of the scanner will make a lot of RPCs for some cases (like importing into every 100th tablet in a million tablet table) and those RPCs will be made serially. A batch scanner would minimize the number of RPCs made for these cases. Batch scanner could also make RPCs in parallel. The Scanner is probably more efficient for reading tablets sequentially, but probably not much slower than the batch scanner. I suspect the batch scanner would not be much slower when data is contiguous and would be much better when data is sparse.
Would be good to gather some performance data before making large changes to improve performance to ensure they are needed. Can not do it in 2.1, but in main we could experiment w/ the SplitMillionIT and try doing things like importing into every 10th tablet for 1000 tablets, every 100th tablet for 1000 tablets, etc.