Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

typo fixes, code clarificaiton #290

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 18, 2025
Merged

typo fixes, code clarificaiton #290

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 18, 2025

Conversation

PeterGy
Copy link
Contributor

@PeterGy PeterGy commented Feb 6, 2025

Before you submit this PR: make sure to put all XENONnT specific information in a wiki-note as the repo is publicly accessible

What does the code in this PR do / what does it improve?

Some typo fixes I came across in the tutorials, as well as some clarifications in the tutorial code.

Can you briefly describe how it works?

Same as before.

Can you give a minimal working example (or illustrate with a figure)?

t -> theta

Please include the following if applicable:

  • Update the docstring(s)
  • Bump plugin version(s)
  • Update the documentation
  • Tests to check the (new) code is working as desired.
  • Does it solve one of the GitHub open issues?

@PeterGy PeterGy requested a review from HenningSE February 6, 2025 16:00
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 6, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 13197310612

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 79.962%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 13153071452: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2534
Relevant Lines: 3169

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Collaborator

@HenningSE HenningSE left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @PeterGy thanks for PR fixing up some typos and improving the code of the csv example! I have just a few minor comments, basically reverting invisible changes in the jupyter notebooks to not introduce unnecessary changes.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this new cell needed or can we revert the changes in this file?

Comment on lines 151 to 157
},
{
"cell_type": "code",
"execution_count": null,
"metadata": {},
"outputs": [],
"source": []
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please remove this empty cell.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No real change here so I would propose to revert these changes.

@PeterGy
Copy link
Contributor Author

PeterGy commented Feb 7, 2025

@HenningSE Thanks for reviewing it so quickly. I have removed the accidental extra cell and reset all the invisible changes.

@PeterGy PeterGy requested a review from HenningSE February 17, 2025 13:41
Copy link
Collaborator

@HenningSE HenningSE left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great! Thanks for the PR @PeterGy I will go ahead and merge now.

@HenningSE HenningSE merged commit 7a651c3 into main Feb 18, 2025
4 checks passed
@HenningSE HenningSE deleted the typo-fix branch February 18, 2025 09:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants