-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 677
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[16.0][MIG] stock_landed_costs_delivery: Migration to version 16.0 #1559
[16.0][MIG] stock_landed_costs_delivery: Migration to version 16.0 #1559
Conversation
/ocabot migration stock_landed_costs_delivery |
…on with the shipping information of the purchase order. TT30782 [UPD] Update stock_landed_costs_delivery.pot [UPD] README.rst
…nked purchase pickings are done TT45656
…hout advanced permissions TT45656
It is necessary to filter the correct Landed Cost (from the correct picking) to set the cost lines. Example use case: - PO without carrier. - Picking A without carrier done > LC A (draft) without cost lines. - Picking B with carrier done > LC B (done) with cost lines. TT45656
c544017
to
5731d17
Compare
ping @pedrobaeza |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/ocabot merge nobump
What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it! |
@pedrobaeza your merge command was aborted due to failed check(s), which you can inspect on this commit of 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1559-by-pedrobaeza-bump-nobump. After fixing the problem, you can re-issue a merge command. Please refrain from merging manually as it will most probably make the target branch red. |
Greenified in #1605 /ocabot merge nobump |
On my way to merge this fine PR! |
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 6543f9d. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
@Tecnativa
TT47862
@pedrobaeza @victoralmau