Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][FIX] fieldservice: Fix manual location creation #1163

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 5, 2024

Conversation

houzefa-abba
Copy link
Member

Read-only+required partner field shown in debug mode was preventing manual creation in debug mode or with OCA module base_technical_features.

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @max3903, @wolfhall,
some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!

@houzefa-abba houzefa-abba changed the title [FIX] fieldservice: Fix manual location creation [16.0][FIX] fieldservice: Fix manual location creation Mar 1, 2024
@houzefa-abba houzefa-abba force-pushed the 16.0-fix-location-creation branch from 71cdf6e to ad158c0 Compare April 4, 2024 15:30
@max3903 max3903 added this to the 16.0 milestone Apr 4, 2024
Read-only+required partner field shown in debug mode was preventing
manual creation in debug mode or with OCA module base_technical_features.
@houzefa-abba houzefa-abba force-pushed the 16.0-fix-location-creation branch from ad158c0 to a33933a Compare April 5, 2024 07:17
@max3903 max3903 self-assigned this Apr 5, 2024
@max3903
Copy link
Member

max3903 commented Apr 5, 2024

/ocabot merge minor

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

On my way to merge this fine PR!
Prepared branch 16.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1163-by-max3903-bump-minor, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 4e6fa2e into OCA:16.0 Apr 5, 2024
7 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 8a1a4b9. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants