-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 366
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[14.0] [MIG-IMP] delivery_ups_oca, migration and oauth #776
[14.0] [MIG-IMP] delivery_ups_oca, migration and oauth #776
Conversation
…to a non-existing key in the code. TT37248
… avoid error. TT37248
…d to show only UPS records. TT37248
@pedrobaeza @etobella What do you think about this?
|
OK, do the mocks. |
7365a67
to
5e732f3
Compare
@LoisRForgeFlow @rousseldenis @Cedric-Pigeon Could you review, please? Thank you. |
@manuelregidor Could you change PR's title ? |
/ocabot migration delivery_ups_oca |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Functional review: LGTM 👍🏻
@ValentinVinagre @Tisho99 Could you review, please? Thank you. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍🏻 .
@JordiBForgeFlow @JordiMForgeFlow @LoisRForgeFlow
you need finally this module? if yes, could do a review 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sorry for the nitpicking 🙏🏼, for the rest code review LGTM
5e732f3
to
37aafe1
Compare
This PR has the |
@LoisRForgeFlow @JordiBForgeFlow @etobella from the 1st of June, UPS will need this authentication. Could we move this forward? |
/ocabot merge nobump |
This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it! |
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 24011e1. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
Working features: