Adding weight branches necessary for uB comparison #342
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe your changes
Adds weight branches to PhaseIITreeMaker. These branches are necessary to reflect all of MicroBooNE's XSec reweights for the joint analysis. These branches fit alongside existing weight branches and follows their conventions. Branch "weight_All_UBGenie" is removed because keeping it would create handling conflicts in STV-analysis (downstream of ToolAnalysis) code for joint cross-section plots.
I also removed a couple forward slashes from a comment block in PhaseIITreeMaker. Doing so fixes a visual bug in vim below the comment block where everything was highlighted as a comment. This change does not uncomment anything, add any additional comments, or change the resultant PhaseIITree ntuple.
Checklist before submitting your PR
new
usage, there is a reason the data must be on the heapnew
there is adelete
, unless I explicitly know why (e.g. ROOT or a BoostStore takes ownership)Additional Material
NA