Benchmark results after fixing Issue #42

benchmark/results/H1_H2_2.csv

@@ -1,33 +1,33 @@
 IsInsightFulIf?|QuestionId|AnswerID|ParagraphIndex|SentenceIndex|Sentence|TruePositive?|Condition|Tags In Condition|NFReqs|Nouns|IsInterrogative?|IsFirstPerson?|IsUnsurePhrase?|HasWantedGrammerDep?
-True|46344963|55428632|1|0|In this case, if one of the element in CW is nil, the whole object is nil while decoding.|False|one of element in CW is nil |['element']|[]|['nil', 'element']|False|False|False|True
+True|46344963|55428632|1|0|In this case, if one of the element in CW is nil, the whole object is nil while decoding.|False|one of element in CW is nil |['element']|[]|['element', 'nil']|False|False|False|True
 False|28459418|58019952|13|0|Now, if I patch this object again with:|False|patch object again with : |['object', 'patch']|[]|['object', 'patch']|False|True|False|True
-True|39423367|39423764|9|0|The only ( rare ) option which is useful in Swift is CW which is required if if the JSON root object could be a value type ( CW, CW, CW or CW ) rather than one of the collection types ( CW or CW ).|True|object could be type |['type', 'object']|[]|['type', 'object']|False|False|False|True
+True|39423367|39423764|9|0|The only ( rare ) option which is useful in Swift is CW which is required if if the JSON root object could be a value type ( CW, CW, CW or CW ) rather than one of the collection types ( CW or CW ).|True|object could be type |['object', 'type']|[]|['object', 'type']|False|False|False|True
 True|30480672|30480777|4|2|Last note: this works only if your value is a String.|True|value is String |['value']|[]|['value']|False|False|False|True
 True|33650399|42032709|0|0|json-loader does n't load json file if it's array, in this case you need to make sure it has a key, for example|True|it 's array |['array']|[]|['array']|False|False|False|True
 True|28596295|48112890|1|0|From this if a user need message then he can get alert message.|True|message then |['message']|[]|['message']|False|False|False|True
-True|31276220|32931094|3|0|You can fix this problem if you are the owner of both domains:|False|you are owner of domains |['owner']|[]|['domains', 'owner']|False|False|False|True
+True|31276220|32931094|3|0|You can fix this problem if you are the owner of both domains:|False|you are owner of domains |['owner']|[]|['owner', 'domains']|False|False|False|True
 True|29696572|29696688|0|0|you can use push method only if the object is an array:|True|object is array |['object', 'array']|[]|['object', 'array']|False|False|False|True
-True|29696572|41064401|0|0|make sure you push into an Array only and if their is error like Uncaught TypeError: data.push is not a function ** then check for type of data you can do this by consol.log ( data ) hope this will help|True|their is error like TypeError : data.push not function ** then check for type of data you can do this by consol.log -LRB- data -RRB- hope this will help |['function', 'type']|['error']|['function', 'consol.log', 'error', 'data.push', 'data', 'type']|False|False|False|True
+True|29696572|41064401|0|0|make sure you push into an Array only and if their is error like Uncaught TypeError: data.push is not a function ** then check for type of data you can do this by consol.log ( data ) hope this will help|True|their is error like TypeError : data.push not function ** then check for type of data you can do this by consol.log -LRB- data -RRB- hope this will help |['function', 'type', 'typeerror']|['error']|['function', 'consol.log', 'error', 'type', 'data', 'data.push', 'TypeError']|False|False|False|True
 True|43494824|43495014|4|0|It is perfectly okay to store a complete structure as one bit of information if it is one bit of information actually.|False|it is bit of information actually |['bit']|[]|['bit', 'information']|False|False|False|True
 True|45598461|45603025|2|1|It's easy enough to adapt the code if that's not the case )|False|that not case |['case']|[]|['case']|False|False|False|True
 True|34600003|34600032|1|0|For instance, if one of the values is CW, the CW would produce an invalid JSON which can not be loaded:|False|one of values is CW |['values']|[]|['values']|False|False|False|True
-True|30101603|43458007|0|0|"FYI, if someone's using jsonb in > = 9.5 and they only care about top-level elements being merged without duplicate keys, then it's as easy as using the | | operator:"|False|'s jsonb in > = 9.5 and they only care about elements being merged without duplicate keys |['keys', 'jsonb', 'elements']|[]|['keys', 'jsonb', 'elements']|False|False|False|True
-True|39406043|52137543|4|1|This mean that you wo n't need to wait until this file will load - as you will if you choice to work with CW - meaning faster application !|False|you choice to work with CW - meaning faster application |['application', 'choice']|[]|['application', 'choice']|False|False|False|True
-True|31730834|31836226|4|1|However I would recommend that you make the translation slightly different then the json file so you can see if that is the case before adding the force reload.|False|that is case before adding reload |['case', 'reload']|[]|['case', 'reload']|False|False|False|True
+True|30101603|43458007|0|0|"FYI, if someone's using jsonb in > = 9.5 and they only care about top-level elements being merged without duplicate keys, then it's as easy as using the | | operator:"|False|'s jsonb in > = 9.5 and they only care about elements being merged without duplicate keys |['jsonb', 'elements', 'keys']|[]|['jsonb', 'elements', 'keys']|False|False|False|True
+True|39406043|52137543|4|1|This mean that you wo n't need to wait until this file will load - as you will if you choice to work with CW - meaning faster application !|False|you choice to work with CW - meaning faster application |['choice', 'application']|[]|['choice', 'application']|False|False|False|True
+True|31730834|31836226|4|1|However I would recommend that you make the translation slightly different then the json file so you can see if that is the case before adding the force reload.|False|that is case before adding reload |['reload', 'case']|[]|['reload', 'case']|False|False|False|True
 True|32818884|32828120|0|1|It can read some, but not create, especially if you host in IIS.|False|you host in IIS |['host']|[]|['host']|False|False|False|True
-True|40057854|40058055|5|0|The third option CW is important if the root object of the received JSON is not an array and not a dictionary.|False|object of JSON not array and not dictionary |['dictionary', 'object', 'array']|[]|['dictionary', 'object', 'array']|False|False|False|True
+True|40057854|40058055|5|0|The third option CW is important if the root object of the received JSON is not an array and not a dictionary.|False|object of JSON not array and not dictionary |['object', 'dictionary', 'array']|[]|['object', 'dictionary', 'array']|False|False|False|True
 False|31102784|31352212|2|0|Does n't matter if the API is streaming or that we need to connect every X second as that we can take into account ?|False|API is streaming or that we need to connect X second as that we can take into account |['streaming', 'account']|[]|['streaming', 'account']|True|False|False|True
 True|31102784|33598613|1|0|You instantiate it with one line if your push message generation script is on the same server.|False|script is on server |['script', 'server']|[]|['script', 'server']|False|False|False|True
-True|32071318|32138635|7|0|The whole idea is mapReady is a simple catch ... You can add the if statement to the initialize function.|False|statement |['statement']|[]|['statement', 'mapReady']|False|False|False|True
-False|32071318|32138635|8|0|In past testing, if i load a website from my localhost and have something like google maps.|False|i load website from localhost and have something like maps |['website', 'localhost', 'load', 'maps']|[]|['website', 'localhost', 'load', 'maps', 'something']|False|True|False|True
+True|32071318|32138635|7|0|The whole idea is mapReady is a simple catch ... You can add the if statement to the initialize function.|False|statement |['statement']|[]|['statement']|False|False|False|True
+False|32071318|32138635|8|0|In past testing, if i load a website from my localhost and have something like google maps.|False|i load website from localhost and have something like maps |['load', 'website', 'localhost', 'maps']|[]|['load', 'website', 'something', 'localhost', 'maps']|False|True|False|True
 True|29044209|29186757|6|0|To be safe, you have to both set the CW option and, if that option is CW, also the CW option.|False|option is CW |['option']|[]|['option']|False|False|False|True
-True|36354704|50128788|0|1|Or while unwrapping you can assign empty string to property if the value is nil|False|value is nil |['value']|[]|['nil', 'value']|False|False|False|True
+True|36354704|50128788|0|1|Or while unwrapping you can assign empty string to property if the value is nil|False|value is nil |['value']|[]|['value', 'nil']|False|False|False|True
 True|36354704|50148332|1|1|And you would n't know if it was nil or empty string from server.|False|it was nil or empty string from server |['string', 'server']|[]|['string', 'server']|False|False|False|True
 False|30249406|30266100|0|0|I do n't know if it's the best solution, but what I'm trying now is to just pass values as strings unformatted except for a decimal point, like so:|False|it 's solution |['solution']|[]|['solution']|False|False|True|True
-True|40421100|40423914|3|0|There's no error because CW satisfies type CW because it has all of its properties, and the CW function can be called with no runtime errors even if what it receives is n't an instance of CW as long as it has the same properties.|False|what it receives n't instance of CW long as it has properties |['properties', 'instance']|[]|['properties', 'instance']|False|False|False|True
+True|40421100|40423914|3|0|There's no error because CW satisfies type CW because it has all of its properties, and the CW function can be called with no runtime errors even if what it receives is n't an instance of CW as long as it has the same properties.|False|what it receives n't instance of CW long as it has properties |['instance', 'properties']|[]|['instance', 'properties']|False|False|False|True
 True|30125965|30186380|12|0|So if PowerShell is your thing, you could have the best of both worlds:|False|PowerShell is thing |['powershell']|[]|['thing', 'PowerShell']|False|False|False|True
-True|36141388|36141631|3|1|So if the data is a nested json structure, the function will not return any of the deeper keys.|False|data is structure |['structure']|[]|['data', 'structure']|False|False|False|True
-True|30156407|30225282|4|0|After this exit point assuming the data confirmed to the model, you can validate if the data is within certain limits.|False|data is within limits |['limits']|[]|['data', 'limits']|False|False|False|True
+True|36141388|36141631|3|1|So if the data is a nested json structure, the function will not return any of the deeper keys.|False|data is structure |['structure']|[]|['structure', 'data']|False|False|False|True
+True|30156407|30225282|4|0|After this exit point assuming the data confirmed to the model, you can validate if the data is within certain limits.|False|data is within limits |['limits']|[]|['limits', 'data']|False|False|False|True
 True|47232187|47232318|1|1|That means you do n't have to use CW anymore if you are on the latest release.|False|you are on release |['release']|[]|['release']|False|False|False|True
 True|29164419|36127195|1|0|In pre-marshalling method, you have to pass a modified fields CW to CW function if client's email is CW.|False|'s email is CW |['email']|[]|['email']|False|False|False|True
 False|37816269|52402431|1|1|If you leave the CW clause, it throws ` Subquery returns more than 1 row' if more keys found ( safe mode ).|False|you leave clause |['clause']|[]|['clause']|False|False|False|True