Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/v0.29.0 2/mult obj tracker updates #1915

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: beta/v0.29
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

TadaKazuto
Copy link

@TadaKazuto TadaKazuto commented Mar 19, 2025

Description

Update sanitization(prune) process to fix the issue of temp lost for a laying adult found in LSim perception test

ソート更新:
Known objects(NO-UNKNOWN objs)かどうかを第一条件、meas timeを第二条件としてソートすることで、tracking objの削除が発生する場合は、”必ずインデックスの小さい方が大きい方を消す”ようにして、forループ以後の処理を単純化。
更に第三条件として、meas 最終updateからの経過時間の小さいという条件を加えることで、area threshの制限等でassociation処理で関連付けできなかったobjに対して、無駄に100ms周期でどんどんspawnされるものを消せるように改善
(
Added sorting concept:
By sorting with known objects (NO-UNKNOWN objs) as the first condition and mean time as the second condition, when a tracking obj is deleted, the smaller index will always delete the larger one, so that simplifying the processing after the for loop.
Furthermore, by adding a third condition of checking the elapsed time since the last meas update, it is possible to eliminate the unnecessary spawning at 100ms intervals for obj that could not be associated by the association process due to area thresh restrictions, or etc.
)

Related links

#1903 (comment)

Parent Issue:

  • Link

How was this PR tested?

LSim Regression result shows some improvemtns.
Total Pass Number: 207->223 (Total 740)
Total Score: 0.57->0.58 (Max->1.0)

Perception Result Summary

Notes for reviewers

None.

Interface changes

None.

Effects on system behavior

None.

@TadaKazuto TadaKazuto marked this pull request as ready for review March 19, 2025 04:58
@saka1-s saka1-s changed the base branch from beta/v0.29.0-3 to beta/v0.29 March 24, 2025 02:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants