Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

different Metabolite annotation in the PKN #32

Open
jtorrejon81 opened this issue Jun 15, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

different Metabolite annotation in the PKN #32

jtorrejon81 opened this issue Jun 15, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@jtorrejon81
Copy link

jtorrejon81 commented Jun 15, 2023

Dear Aurelien, Attila,

Excellent bioinfo tool, congratulations!

I have two questions concerning to the metabolite annotation in the PKN

1/ Looking the full PKN network, I have realized that metabolites IDs with different nomenclature than HMDB have been also included, for example see below:
-Metab__HMDB0000132_c (HMDB nomenclature)
-Metab__4782_c (PUBCHEM nomenclature)
-Metab__c226coa_c (KEGG nomenclature)
-Metab__pa_hs_c (Unknown nomenclature)

I am wondering if the different metabolites nomenclature are taking into account when the function "format_COSMOS_res" is applied to rename metabolites or only HMDB?

2/ it is possible to add manually new nodes/interactions in the PKN while keeping the same format, right?

Many thanks for your help
Best regards,

@adugourd
Copy link
Member

Hi, sorry for delayed answer.

the metab IDs were alwys a bit tricky to set up consistently. We used by default and whenever we could a tranlsation to HMBD IDs. However, the metabolites comes from two ressources that themselves use PUBCHEM CIDs and BIGG IDs respectivelly. Therefore, whenever we couldn'T map a metab name in the network to HMDB (not all chemicals are referenced rthere), we left the ID of the original database in place.

You can add manually new interactions to the network of course :)

By default I would advise to use HMDB as well whenever possible.

Cheers,

Aurelien

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants