Skip to content

Commit 3b3d319

Browse files
committed
Correct typo
1 parent f4c1c98 commit 3b3d319

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-1
lines changed

_posts/2013-02-04-BewareofProductivityTools.html

+1-1
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ <h3 id="366bc0628827489d84a2c65d1881515d">
8585
Furthermore, if you believe that Pair Programming is one good and productive way to produce software, you must also realize that at every given moment, at least one person isn't typing at all. As Martin Fowler <a href="http://martinfowler.com/bliki/PairProgrammingMisconceptions.html">puts it</a>: "that [Pair-Programming halves the productivity of developers] would be true if the hardest part of programming was typing". In my experience, this is not the case. Thus, I'm not convinced that 'productivity tools' make anyone more productive.
8686
</p>
8787
<p>
88-
If you've ever looked beyond the Microsoft echo chamber in the last decade, you will have heard a particularly group of developers boast unmatched productivity. Those would be <a href="http://rubyonrails.org/">Ruby on Rails</a> developers. Lately, it seems to me that many alpha geeks gravitate towards JavaScript (and particularly <a href="http://nodejs.org/">Node.js</a>). And what about <a href="http://www.python.org/">Python</a> or Clojure? In all cases it seems that the reason why cutting edge programmers are leaving .NET, in favor of other languages and platforms, is because of better productivity. What do these languages have in common? Well, the preferred development environment certainly isn't Visual Studio. These programmers 'get by' with <a href="http://www.vim.org/">Vim</a>, <a href="http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/">Emacs</a>, <a href="http://www.sublimetext.com/">Sublime Text</a>, and many other editors. Apparently, it's possible to be 'crazy productive' without Visual Studio and a 'productivity tool'.
88+
If you've ever looked beyond the Microsoft echo chamber in the last decade, you will have heard a particular group of developers boast unmatched productivity. Those would be <a href="http://rubyonrails.org/">Ruby on Rails</a> developers. Lately, it seems to me that many alpha geeks gravitate towards JavaScript (and particularly <a href="http://nodejs.org/">Node.js</a>). And what about <a href="http://www.python.org/">Python</a> or Clojure? In all cases it seems that the reason why cutting edge programmers are leaving .NET, in favor of other languages and platforms, is because of better productivity. What do these languages have in common? Well, the preferred development environment certainly isn't Visual Studio. These programmers 'get by' with <a href="http://www.vim.org/">Vim</a>, <a href="http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/">Emacs</a>, <a href="http://www.sublimetext.com/">Sublime Text</a>, and many other editors. Apparently, it's possible to be 'crazy productive' without Visual Studio and a 'productivity tool'.
8989
</p>
9090
<h3 id="db8ed66907bd4890a830a7c9455bbaeb">
9191
Railroading <a href="#db8ed66907bd4890a830a7c9455bbaeb" title="permalink">#</a>

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)