Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
127 lines (58 loc) · 8.75 KB

Readings.md

File metadata and controls

127 lines (58 loc) · 8.75 KB

Readings

Module 1: Introduction – Liaison Librarianship

  • Johnson, A. M. (2020). Reference and Liaison Librarians: Endangered Species or “Vital Partners?” Views of Academic Library Administrators. Journal of Library Administration, 60(7), 784-799. doi:10.1080/01930826.2020.1786979

  • Kranich, N., Lotts, M., Nielsen, J., & Ward, J.H. (2020). Moving from Collecting to Connecting: Articulating, Assessing, and Communicating the Work of Liaison Librarians. portal: Libraries and the Academy 20(2), 285-304. doi:10.1353/pla.2020.0015.

  • Abrizah, A., Inuwa, S., & Afiqah-Izzati, N. (2016). Systematic Literature Review Informing LIS Professionals on Embedding Librarianship Roles. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(6), 636-643. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.08.010

  • Hurt, P. (1934). "Bridging the Gulf between the College Classroom and the Library." Library Journal, 59, 748-51.

Module 2: Science, Scientists, & Scientific Information

  • Oreskes, N. (2019). WHY TRUST SCIENCE? Perspectives from the History and Philosophy of Science. In Why Trust Science? (pp. 15-68): Princeton University Press.

  • Midtgarden, T. (2020). Peirce's Classification of the Sciences. Knowledge Organization, 47(3), 267-278. doi:10.5771/0943-7444-2020-3-267

  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303

Module 3: Outreach

Module 4: Soft skills and Community

  • Succi, C., & Canovi, M. (2020). Soft skills to enhance graduate employability: comparing students and employers’ perceptions. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1834-1847. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1585420

  • Read, A., & Cox, A. (2020). Underrated or overstated? The need for technological competencies in scholarly communication librarianship. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(4), 102155. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102155

  • Gola, C. H., & Martin, L. (2020). Creating an Emotional Intelligence Community of Practice: A Case Study for Academic Libraries. Journal of Library Administration, 60(7), 752–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2020.1786982

Module 5: Ethnography

  • Reeves, K. (2008). Qualitative Research: Qualitative Research Methodologies: Ethnography. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 337(7668), 512–514. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1020

  • D’Elia, M.J. (2016). Value Proposition Conversations in Libraries: Facilitator’s Toolkit 1.0, Association of Research Libraries.

  • Clement K., A., Carr, S., Johnson, L., Carter, A., Dosch Brianne, R., Kaufman, J., . . . Walker, T. (2018). Reading, writing, and … running? Assessing active space in libraries. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 19(3), 166-175. doi:10.1108/PMM-03-2018-0011

  • Vaughan, K.T. (2020). Evaluating the Single Service Point Using the Person-Environment-Occupation Model. portal: Libraries and the Academy 20(2), 361-379. doi:10.1353/pla.2020.0018

Module 6: Data Librarians

  • Federer L. (2018). Defining data librarianship: a survey of competencies, skills, and training. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 106(3), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.306

  • Mayernik, M. S., Davis, L., Kelly, K., Dattore, B., Strand, G., Worley, S. J., & Marlino, M. (2014, 2014//). Research Center Insights into Data Curation Education and Curriculum. Paper presented at the Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries -- TPDL 2013 Selected Workshops, Cham.

Module 7: Research Misconduct

  • Herr, M. (2019). Responding to Research Misconduct: A Primer for LIS Professionals. Science & Technology Libraries, 38(3), 272-287. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2019.1644268

  • Budd, J. M., Coble, Z., & Abritis, A. (2016). An investigation of retracted articles in the biomedical literature. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 53(1), 1-9. doi:10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301055

Module 8: Research Data Management

  • Wittenberg, J., Sackmann, A., & Jaffe, R. (2018). Situating Expertise in Practice: Domain-Based Data Management Training for Liaison Librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(3), 323-329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.04.004

  • Koltay, T. (2019). Accepted and Emerging Roles of Academic Libraries in Supporting Research 2.0. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 45(2), 75-80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2019.01.001

Module 9: Modes and Models of Instruction

  • Dolničar, D., Podgornik, B. B., & Bartol, T. (2017). A comparative study of three teaching methods on student information literacy in stand-alone credit-bearing university courses. Journal of Information Science, 43(5), 601–614. https://t.ly/rB2OZ

  • Fontane, W. M. (2017). Video tutorials revisited: The relationship between their use and library assessment quiz scores. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 24(1), 90–102. https://t.ly/XZjlV

  • Guo, Y. R., & Goh, D. H.-L. (2016). Library Escape: User-Centered Design of an Information Literacy Game. The Library Quarterly, 86(3), 330–355. https://t.ly/1vJOr

  • Loo, J. L., Eifler, D., Smith, E., Pendse, L., He, J., Sholinbeck, M., … Dupuis, E. A. (2016). Flipped Instruction for Information Literacy: Five Instructional Cases of Academic Librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(3), 273–280. https://t.ly/mqekL

  • Whitver, S., & Lo, L. (2017). Asking Questions in the Classroom: An Exploration of Tools and Techniques Used in the Library Instruction Classroom. Communications in Information Literacy, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2017.11.1.41

Module 10: Scholarly Communication

https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2021/01/13/guest-post-evaluating-publishers-as-partners-with-libraries-and-higher-education/?informz=1

Module 11: Organizational Communication

  • Lewis, D. W., & Orr, K. (2018). The Age Demographics of Librarians and the Organizational Challenge Facing Academic Libraries. Library Leadership & Management, 32(3), 1–24.

  • Bullis, C. (2005). From Productivity Servant to Foundation to Connection: One History of Organizational Communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 18(4), 595–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318904273737

  • Martínez-Cardama, S., & Pacios, A. R. (2020). Twitter communication of university libraries in the face of Covid-19. Profesional De La Información, 29(6). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.nov.18

  • Simonsen, J. E. (2015). The Liaison's Role in Serving Agriculture & Life Sciences Information Users: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, 16(1), 11-30. doi:10.1080/10496505.2014.982753

  • Cooper, D., Bankston, S., Bracke, M. S., Callahan, B., Chang, H., Delserone, L. M., Diekmann, F., . . .Young, S. (2017, June 7). Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Agriculture Scholars. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.303663

  • The Message Box Workbook

https://www.compassscicomm.org/leadership-development/the-message-box/#what-is

https://www.compassscicomm.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/The-Message-Box-Workbook.pdf

Module 12: Collaborative Analysis