Skip to content

Add target_temp_step attribute to water_heater #1180

Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

We discussed this architecture proposal and we find that this is indeed a good change to make! So let's continue with implementing this field.

Replies: 2 comments 2 replies

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
2 replies
@LG-ThinQ-Integration
Comment options

@frenck
Comment options

Answer selected by joostlek
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
3 participants