Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistent tags naming #153

Open
BlueskyFR opened this issue Feb 26, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

Inconsistent tags naming #153

BlueskyFR opened this issue Feb 26, 2025 · 4 comments

Comments

@BlueskyFR
Copy link

From the README:

Sticking with a tagged release might offer better trade-offs going forward.

Although tag names seem to be inconsistent: 1.5.0 vs v1.5.1 for the latest one.

Also, there is no easy way to auto update from 1.5.0 to 1.5.1 using this mechanism.

Isn't there a true versioning method you can use for the flake instead of that?

Thanks!

@gytis-ivaskevicius
Copy link
Owner

yeah, i was doing them manually and did not pay too much attention. I should probably fix that

Isn't there a true versioning method you can use for the flake instead of that?

I am not sure what you mean

@BlueskyFR
Copy link
Author

BlueskyFR commented Feb 27, 2025

I recommend rewriting all tags as major.minor.patch for ease of use.

Although the current method does not allow seamless upgrades for end users, thus requiring a manual check every now and then... This may be a Flake limitation but it would be weird!

Isn't there a proper way to allow upgrading automatically to the latest version?

My very limited knowlegde of flakes tells me that either master should always be stable, or a stable branch should exist, in which every new stable release would be merged into.

@gytis-ivaskevicius
Copy link
Owner

oh, I see what you mean. It is okay to use master, it generally is the latest release candidate and this project is not actively developed since it is "complete" so it's not like you will get many updates anyway

@BlueskyFR
Copy link
Author

Okay, thanks for the answer!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants