Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

parameter optimisaion via factorial #22

Open
3 of 6 tasks
frank0434 opened this issue Dec 11, 2020 · 9 comments
Open
3 of 6 tasks

parameter optimisaion via factorial #22

frank0434 opened this issue Dec 11, 2020 · 9 comments
Assignees
Labels
workflow bursting pipe that data is not flowing

Comments

@frank0434
Copy link
Owner

frank0434 commented Dec 11, 2020

  • Prune the workflow to use only one DUL_LL method - the arbitrary one.
  • Define the ranges of U and ConA
  • Modify the Base.apsimx
  • Decide whether gsmax and R50 need to be included or not.
  • Define the ranges of gsmax and R50
  • Modify the Base.apsimx
@frank0434 frank0434 added the workflow bursting pipe that data is not flowing label Dec 11, 2020
@frank0434 frank0434 self-assigned this Dec 11, 2020
@frank0434
Copy link
Owner Author

image

@frank0434
Copy link
Owner Author

Actual soil evaporation is equal to potential evaporation up to a specified limit u (stage I) after which the evaporation rate becomes proportional to the square root of time (stage II):

$cumulative_second_stage = cona * t^0.5$

Methodology in soil-water-solute balance modelling: An evaluation of the APSIM-SoilWat and SWIMv2 models

@frank0434
Copy link
Owner Author

frank0434 commented Dec 13, 2020

A conservative estimate of 2 is recommended for U as a modelling parameter. This is lower than most values commonly in use (3-8), however in agreement with recommendations from Yunusa et al. (1994) for Australian conditions.

ConA - winter: 3.0(±1.3) to 3.7(±1.4)
ConA - summer: 4.6(±0.4) to 5.3(±0.4)

SOIL EVAPORATION – HOW MUCH WATER IS LOST FROM NORTHERN CROP SYSTEMS AND DO AGRONOMIC MODELS ACCURATELY REPRESENT THIS LOSS?

@frank0434
Copy link
Owner Author

frank0434 commented Dec 13, 2020

In New Zealand
U and α are soil texture properties of 9 mm and 4.4 mm/day-1/2 reported for a silt loam soil
(Jamieson et al., 1995a), similar

ES occurred when the SWC content of the top layer was greater than the lower limit. from Richard's thesis

@frank0434
Copy link
Owner Author

frank0434 commented Dec 13, 2020

How to calculate Evaporation? water balance?
ConA must be smaller than U?
No ConA is in charge of the 2nd stage. U is the amount of water control when to go to the 2nd stage.

Solutions - CompositeFactor?
image

How can I check if the simulation use the correct values?
report only show the name of the value, not the exact values

@frank0434
Copy link
Owner Author

2430 simulations if using a setup like the snapshot
Simulations complete [824.97 sec]

@frank0434
Copy link
Owner Author

frank0434 commented Dec 13, 2020

[Soil].SoilWater.SummerU = 1 to 9 step 1
[Soil].SoilWater.SummerCona = 1 to 6 step 0.5

image

Seems we can remove the combination below simulation ID 2000

Remove 2000
image

Seems ok to remove 3000

image

U ranges from 1 to 9
ConA ranges from 4 to 6
This reduced the number of simulations down to 2430 from 5346

The mismatch in the red circle could be caused by Winter u and cona
what is the definition of summer and winter here?
Answers:

 [Description("Start date for switch to winter parameters for soil water evaporation")]
        public string WinterDate { get; set; } = "1-Apr";
[Description("Start date for switch to summer parameters for soil water evaporation")]
        public string SummerDate { get; set; } = "1-Nov";

@frank0434
Copy link
Owner Author

frank0434 commented Dec 14, 2020

with an arbitrary combination parameters:
U = 4
Cona = 4
Gsmax = 0.006
and the 54 KLR with RFV and 0.06 SKL
image
image

@frank0434
Copy link
Owner Author

frank0434 commented Dec 14, 2020

with an arbitrary combination parameters:
U = 4
Cona = 4
Gsmax = 0.006
winterU = 1, 10
wintercona = 9, 0
and the 54 KLR with RFV and 0.06 SKL

image

lower the U and cona during winter definitely improve that funny bit in the red circle.
but guess the definition of summer of winter need to be tested as well?

image

change the summer definition from 1-Nov to 1-Sep

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
workflow bursting pipe that data is not flowing
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant