You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In #729 we confirmed that some parcels in our data are missing shapes in spatial.parcel for certain years due to those PINs not existing in the County's parcel DB. While we will hopefully fix this issue in the source data at some point, that will require coordination with the Clerk's office, so it may take a while.
In the meantime, there are a few simple steps we can take to fill the spatial data that is most important to us.
Tasks
Let's modify the pipeline that produces our location and proximity features to fill attributes for parcels that are missing shapes. There are two related tasks in this effort:
Task 1: Geocode parcels based on their address.
Task 2: For parcels with missing or incorrect locations even after geocoding, fill their location attributes based on nearest neighbors.
See the linked sub-issues for details.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Background
In #729 we confirmed that some parcels in our data are missing shapes in
spatial.parcel
for certain years due to those PINs not existing in the County's parcel DB. While we will hopefully fix this issue in the source data at some point, that will require coordination with the Clerk's office, so it may take a while.In the meantime, there are a few simple steps we can take to fill the spatial data that is most important to us.
Tasks
Let's modify the pipeline that produces our
location
andproximity
features to fill attributes for parcels that are missing shapes. There are two related tasks in this effort:See the linked sub-issues for details.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: