You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the enhancement
I was wondering if support for DLCs is planned as I think they would make a decent addition to constructing spending conditions in wallets. I found a reference for proof of reserves in #356 and the repo https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk-reserves.
Use case
We'd be interested in constructing DLC within a Rust-only wallet implementation for a two-way Bitcoin<>EVM bridge. However, there are several other teams working on DLCs for all sorts of use cases.
Hi @nud3l, I'd expect there never to be support for DLC protocols maintained as part of this project. The research at every level still in flux and there are many ways to approach the protocol implementation. As you mentioned the rust-dlc project is the most bleeding edge attempt at a standardized implementaiton -- but is still changing a lot. We are of course open to adding APIs and features that make it easier to use bdk with projects like rust-dlc.
Describe the enhancement
I was wondering if support for DLCs is planned as I think they would make a decent addition to constructing spending conditions in wallets. I found a reference for proof of reserves in #356 and the repo https://github.com/bitcoindevkit/bdk-reserves.
Use case
We'd be interested in constructing DLC within a Rust-only wallet implementation for a two-way Bitcoin<>EVM bridge. However, there are several other teams working on DLCs for all sorts of use cases.
Additional context
I'm aware of the early stage Rust DLC library https://github.com/p2pderivatives/rust-dlc
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: