You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
feat(autonomous_emergency_braking): add info about IMU vs Steering info for AEB doc (#7098)
* add info about IMU vs Steering
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <danielsanchezaran@gmail.com>
* steering rate ->angle
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <danielsanchezaran@gmail.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: Daniel Sanchez <danielsanchezaran@gmail.com>
Copy file name to clipboardexpand all lines: control/autonomous_emergency_braking/README.md
+18
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -16,6 +16,24 @@ This module has following assumptions.
16
16
17
17

18
18
19
+
### IMU path generation: steering angle vs IMU's angular velocity
20
+
21
+
Currently, the IMU-based path is generated using the angular velocity obtained by the IMU itself. It has been suggested that the steering angle could be used instead onf the angular velocity.
22
+
23
+
The pros and cons of both approaches are:
24
+
25
+
IMU angular velocity:
26
+
27
+
- (+) Usually, it has high accuracy
28
+
- (-)Vehicle vibration might introduce noise.
29
+
30
+
Steering angle:
31
+
32
+
- (+) Not so noisy
33
+
- (-) May have a steering offset or a wrong gear ratio, and the steering angle of Autoware and the real steering may not be the same.
34
+
35
+
For the moment, there are no plans to implement the steering angle on the path creation process of the AEB module.
36
+
19
37
### Limitations
20
38
21
39
- AEB might not be able to react with obstacles that are close to the ground. It depends on the performance of the pre-processing methods applied to the point cloud.
0 commit comments