You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So hopefully we don't ever run into this on mainnet, it's happening bc on Housefure some older channels expired and we had to open new ones.
@pedrorezende@euharrison def curious what is going on with the transfer/channel-7/transfer/channel-7/uosmo.
Ideally in my mind, we would only use an alias for a single instance of a given token type and then use the transfer/channel-X/yyyy string otherwise. So in this example, transfer/channel-7/uosmo would appear as Osmosis while transfer/channel-0/uosmo would appear as transfer/channel-0/uosmo. Would this be done using the chain registry? How does Namadillo get Osmosis for the token anyway?
Agree, we should render the tnam... for transfer/channel-0/uosmo as the easiest path, or render transfer/channel-0/uosmo if we create this map on the code
Related to the transfer/channel-7/transfer/channel-7/uosmo, @Fraccaman@grarco it came from the indexer, do you have any idea why it's happening?
I'm seeing this in the work on #1687.
From this log you can see that it's the same asset just coming from different traces:
Sidenote, this trace seems like it's a bug with double
transfer/channel-7
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: