You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Even though the field DMP-ID exists and the information will be automatically provided, we need an explicit mapping to the fields above to store the information. Thats why it would be good to have these children elements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Do you expect in your use cases to assign a persistent identifier to DMPs or some other identifiers as well?
I am asking, because so far we considered that the dmp_id would be used in most cases to assign a DOI, and that's why we assumed that there is a stable system behind the identifier that would have these (e.g. publisher, license, date_published) fields. This assumption holds basically for all PID systems.
Even though the field DMP-ID exists and the information will be automatically provided, we need an explicit mapping to the fields above to store the information. Thats why it would be good to have these children elements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: