Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Confuse about predict scales and shifts and the loss #9

Open
Liupengshuaige opened this issue Sep 7, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Confuse about predict scales and shifts and the loss #9

Liupengshuaige opened this issue Sep 7, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@Liupengshuaige
Copy link

Hi:
In another issue, you said the inverseForm outputs 4 values which stand for scales and shifts, so if I want to minimize the inverseForm loss, the scales should be close to 1 and shifts should be chose to 0.But in your code, the loss is (((distance_coeffs*distance_coeffs).sum(dim=1))**0.5).mean(), which will push all of 4 values to 0, why ?
Looking forward to your reply. Thank you!

@sborse3
Copy link

sborse3 commented Sep 10, 2021

Hey @Liupengshuaige, thanks for the question! For Euclidean, we normalize the parameters before training IF network, as this will reduce bias towards any one parameter

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants