You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi:
In another issue, you said the inverseForm outputs 4 values which stand for scales and shifts, so if I want to minimize the inverseForm loss, the scales should be close to 1 and shifts should be chose to 0.But in your code, the loss is (((distance_coeffs*distance_coeffs).sum(dim=1))**0.5).mean(), which will push all of 4 values to 0, why ?
Looking forward to your reply. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey @Liupengshuaige, thanks for the question! For Euclidean, we normalize the parameters before training IF network, as this will reduce bias towards any one parameter
Hi:
In another issue, you said the inverseForm outputs 4 values which stand for scales and shifts, so if I want to minimize the inverseForm loss, the scales should be close to 1 and shifts should be chose to 0.But in your code, the loss is (((distance_coeffs*distance_coeffs).sum(dim=1))**0.5).mean(), which will push all of 4 values to 0, why ?
Looking forward to your reply. Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: