You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Improve UX on Interface selection when creating a Virtual Network
Use case
Currently when adding a virtual network in OpenNebula, you have to type in the "physical interface" on all the different modes (Bridge, VLAN, VXLAN, etc.). It would be great if this could poll the available interfaces within the cluster and the interface be selected from a dropdown.
While the text states "physical interface" this can also be a bonded interface as well, so this should be taken into account as well.
Interface Changes
I don't know if such changes would be needed in CLI, API etc (I guess not) and think this would mostly be useful for those utilising the Sunstone GUI as its a big UX improvement.
Additional Context
n/a
Progress Status
Code committed
Testing - QA
Documentation (Release notes - resolved issues, compatibility, known issues)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
Improve UX on Interface selection when creating a Virtual Network
Use case
Currently when adding a virtual network in OpenNebula, you have to type in the "physical interface" on all the different modes (Bridge, VLAN, VXLAN, etc.). It would be great if this could poll the available interfaces within the cluster and the interface be selected from a dropdown.
While the text states "physical interface" this can also be a bonded interface as well, so this should be taken into account as well.
Interface Changes
I don't know if such changes would be needed in CLI, API etc (I guess not) and think this would mostly be useful for those utilising the Sunstone GUI as its a big UX improvement.
Additional Context
n/a
Progress Status
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: