Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Flexibility in working with domains #467

Open
edward-burn opened this issue Feb 22, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Flexibility in working with domains #467

edward-burn opened this issue Feb 22, 2025 · 2 comments
Milestone

Comments

@edward-burn
Copy link
Collaborator

Not infrequently data partners are using concepts in a diffrent table than would be expected. We could allow the user to override the presumed relationships (

domainsData <- dplyr::tribble(
)

For example, say the user have a concept set that only includes condition concepts but that they know some of these are also used in the observation table we can let them expand to finding records from both tables.

@nmercadeb
Copy link
Collaborator

would this be an argument in conceptCohort? or something more general like a global option?

@edward-burn
Copy link
Collaborator Author

add argument table (or better name). If NULL, current behaviour - we work it out from domains. If given, we look for all concepts in each of the tables specified.

@edward-burn edward-burn added this to the v0.40 milestone Mar 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants