Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removing process separation between euphotic and deep ocean regions in iHAMOCC? #399

Open
jmaerz opened this issue Sep 12, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@jmaerz
Copy link
Collaborator

jmaerz commented Sep 12, 2024

Hi @JorgSchwinger, @TomasTorsvik and @tjiputra ,
with #367, the option to remove the (artifical) separation between euphotic (kwrbioz) and deeper ocean region processes was granted. Moving forward to NorESMK2.5, I wonder and as suggested in #340, in how far we should aim at making this the new default and/or removing the current switch that we currently use to achieve this. Any thoughts?

@JorgSchwinger
Copy link
Contributor

I have not looked in depth at any results with the option enabled. I would like to see a long model run first. My first impression was that the changes were large, so difficult to say at this stage.

@jmaerz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jmaerz commented Sep 13, 2024

I agree, it would be good to better understand the implications (in both, isopynic and hybrid coordinates). I suspect it thus makes sense to re-check the output and leave the switch in until a later stage.

@JorgSchwinger
Copy link
Contributor

@jmaerz @TomasTorsvik

I have now a 200 year model run with lkrwbiozoff=.true. (extended N-cycle turned off, hybrid coordinates). The results look terrible, but I think for most things I would know why and what needs to be changed. The primary thing is that the export from the euphotic zone is too small (surface nutrients increasing, and that the CaCO3 production needs to be tuned down substantially, since we have now a lot of recycled PP and "recycled export". Diagnostics is here:

https://ns2345k.web.sigma2.no/datalake/diagnostics/noresm/jschwing/NOINYOC_T62_tn21_51/HAMOCC_DIAG/yrs191to200-obs/index.html

Time series: (tn21_27=CMIP6, tn21_51=euphotic zone new, tn21_48=euphotic zone old, tn48_50=MA4GO)

NorDiag_gts_T62_tn21_27-tn21_51-tn21_48-tn21_50_0001-0200.pdf

@jmaerz
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jmaerz commented Feb 14, 2025

HI @JorgSchwinger , thanks for providing this info. Just to be sure: tn21_51 is the only simulation, where you set lkwrbioz_off=.true.? I see that wmin is rather low, which likely explains part of the high surface nutrients.

@JorgSchwinger
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, that is the only one. I'll try to increase wminbut also epsheris a knob to play with.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants