-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Removing process separation between euphotic and deep ocean regions in iHAMOCC? #399
Comments
I have not looked in depth at any results with the option enabled. I would like to see a long model run first. My first impression was that the changes were large, so difficult to say at this stage. |
I agree, it would be good to better understand the implications (in both, isopynic and hybrid coordinates). I suspect it thus makes sense to re-check the output and leave the switch in until a later stage. |
I have now a 200 year model run with Time series: (tn21_27=CMIP6, tn21_51=euphotic zone new, tn21_48=euphotic zone old, tn48_50=MA4GO) NorDiag_gts_T62_tn21_27-tn21_51-tn21_48-tn21_50_0001-0200.pdf |
HI @JorgSchwinger , thanks for providing this info. Just to be sure: tn21_51 is the only simulation, where you set |
Yes, that is the only one. I'll try to increase |
Hi @JorgSchwinger, @TomasTorsvik and @tjiputra ,
with #367, the option to remove the (artifical) separation between euphotic (
kwrbioz
) and deeper ocean region processes was granted. Moving forward to NorESMK2.5, I wonder and as suggested in #340, in how far we should aim at making this the new default and/or removing the current switch that we currently use to achieve this. Any thoughts?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: