Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 17, 2025. It is now read-only.

Review some hash algorithms #34

Closed
nkaskov opened this issue Jun 4, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Review some hash algorithms #34

nkaskov opened this issue Jun 4, 2020 · 3 comments
Assignees
@ipavrus
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@nkaskov
Copy link
Contributor

nkaskov commented Jun 4, 2020

We need to review the remaining hashes for Boost usage.
@nkaskov nkaskov added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 4, 2020
@nkaskov nkaskov added this to the Boost milestone Jun 4, 2020
@nkaskov
Copy link
Contributor Author

nkaskov commented Jun 4, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Hashes require a review:

  • tiger
  • whirlpool
  • skein
  • sm3
  • cubehash

a1falcon added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 4, 2020
@a1falcon
Equal sizes of pack written & temporarily fixed SHA-2 bug #30 #34
3202f50
@nkaskov nkaskov pinned this issue Jun 5, 2020
nkaskov referenced this issue Jun 10, 2020
Crypto3 detail updated
26a2143
ipavrus pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 10, 2020
make_uint_t added #34
8223941
ipavrus pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 13, 2020
Update tiger functions #34
b459069
ipavrus pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 13, 2020
@a1falcon
Fixed message size #34
82f9e72
ipavrus pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2020
Update Tiger #34
8fd879b
@nkaskov
Copy link
Contributor Author

nkaskov commented Jun 16, 2020

Tiger has not been finished yet. The result of hash differs from tests for some reason.

ipavrus pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 16, 2020
Update styl #34
daeaa17
@nkaskov
Copy link
Contributor Author

nkaskov commented Jun 18, 2020

The issue was cut into several issues (#50 #51 #52 etc.).

@nkaskov nkaskov closed this as completed Jun 18, 2020
@nkaskov nkaskov unpinned this issue Jun 18, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@ipavrus ipavrus

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@nkaskov @ipavrus