You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are some very interesting projects around open AI under development and I think it would be good to run a process to add some more specific requirements around AI. I have noted some points to frame a possible discussion and process:
What licenses are required for AI algorithms (needs to be added to indicator 2), models and datasets.
Should we specify that there could different licenses on source code/algorithms and training data? One could argue that this is covered in the standard in its current form, in indicator 2 with reference to open source and open data?
Would we require the original training data to be openly licensed for an AI-model to be accepted as a DPG?
Can a dataset that is created based on non-open AI/ML be licensed as open data?
Regarding indicator 9. Can “no harm” in one context be “harm” in another context when for example ML classification is based on the same training data, but used on a different dataset?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@christer-io Thanks for sharing your thoughts on the open AI requirements as per the current version of the DPG standard. Kindly is an good example of a DPG which tackled some of the concerns raised as illustrated below:
Explicitly indicated licenses for software and data
It may not be mandatory to openly license all the original training data considering some datasets may be accessed online from various sources. For instance an ML engineer could use transfer learning to speed up the optimization results of a convolution model using VGG16 which has already been extensively trained and open sourced. However, we should make it mandatory to open source the algorithm to be able to reproduce similar performance results in future iterations.
Kindly was pre-built from Hugging Face (which offers both open-source platform and subscription-based features that NLP practitioners can deploy in their models.)
PS: For more information on Kindly, please refer to the documentation here.
There are some very interesting projects around open AI under development and I think it would be good to run a process to add some more specific requirements around AI. I have noted some points to frame a possible discussion and process:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: