-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
/
Copy path1131
141 lines (112 loc) · 5.48 KB
/
1131
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
======================================================================
CFJ 1131
The message sent to the Public Forum with headers which read in
part:
Message-Id:<3.0.1.32.19990406101136.009bcec-
@proxy.pn.beam.com.au>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 10:11:36 +1000
To: agora-busines-@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au
From: janet998-@yahoo.com
Subject: Maximize your website's traffic!
was sent by Steve.
======================================================================
Called by: Steve
First Judge: Murphy (defaulted)
Second Judge: Morendil
Judgement: TRUE
Judge selection (2nd):
Eligible: Morendil, Elysion, Crito, Beefurabi, Wes, Chuck
Not eligible:
Caller: Steve
Barred: Chuck, Crito
Had their turn: Oerjan, Blob, Murphy, Peekee, Vlad, Kolja A.,
elJefe, Michael
Already served: -
Defaulted: -
By request: -
On Hold: -
======================================================================
History:
Called by Steve: Mon, 3 May 1999 20:31:43 +1000
Assigned to Murphy: Thu, 6 May 1999 15:24:16 +0200
Murphy defaulted: Fri, 21 May 1999 21:57:05 +0200
Reassigned to Morendil: as of this message
Judged TRUE by Morendil: as of this message
=====================================================================
Judges's Arguments:
Judicial precedent, namely the Board of Appeals' decision on CFJ 1126,
requires a Judgement of TRUE for consistency's sake.
=====================================================================
Caller's Arguments:
It is worth beginning with a reminder from R1575:
In all other CFJs [than those alleging the violation of a Rule or
the commission of a Crime], the Judgement shall be consistent with
the preponderance of the evidence at hand.
I believe that a massive preponderance of the evidence at hand shows
that I was the sender of the message identified in the Statement.
Firstly, there is the nature of the scam itself. No other Player was
as passionate in their opposition to Summary Adoption, and no other
Player was likely to try so hard to repeal it. Also, there is the
mention of my name in the text of "An Object Lesson", and the
simultaneous adoption Without Objection of my Proposal "A Separation
of Powers".
Secondly, there is my knowledge of the details of the scam. This
includes my knowledge of the contents of the message, and my ability
to explain in detail how it was sent. This constitutes extremely
strong evidence that I sent the message.
The above is sufficient, but there is more. The full headers of the
message read (I've numbered them for convenience):
1 From janet998-@yahoo.com Fri Apr 16 01:50:10 1999
Return-Path:
Delivered-To: listsaver-of-agora-busines-@findmail.com
Received: (qmail 16895 invoked by uid 7770); 16 Apr 1999 08:50:08
-0000
5 Received: from gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au (131.170.42.16)
by vault.egroups.com with SMTP; 16 Apr 1999 08:50:08 -0000
Received: (from majordom-@localhost)
by gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA31109
for agora-business-list; Fri, 16 Apr 1999 08:39:37 GMT
10 Received: from fw.serc.rmit.edu.au (fw-in.serc.rmit.edu.au
[131.170.42.1])
by gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id
AAA11038
for ; Fri 16 Apr 1999 00:15:08 GMT
Received: (from mai-@localhost)
15 by fw.serc.rmit.edu.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) id KAA02250
for ; Fri 16 Apr 1999 10:19:58 +1000 (EST)
Received: from dns1.beam.com.au(203.14.101.241) by
fw.serc.rmit.edu.au
via smap (V2.1) id xma002248; Fri 16 Apr 99 10:19:32 +1000
Received: from angusm (dns4.beam.com.au [203.14.101.195])
20 by dns1.beam.com.au (8.9.0/8.9.0/Debian/GNU) with SMTP id
KAA21757
for ; Fri 16 Apr 1999 10:25:53 +1000
Message-Id:
3.0.1.32.19990406101136.009bcec-@proxy.pn.beam.com.au
X-Sender: angus-@proxy.pn.beam.com.au
25 X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 10:11:36 +1000
To: agora-busines-@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au
From: janet998-@yahoo.com
Subject: Maximize your website's traffic!
30 Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-agora-busines-@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: agora-discussio-@gecko.serc.rmit.edu.au
The Judge may recall the explanation I gave of how the message was
sent. I said that I had arranged for a friend of mine to keep a look
out for spam messages which would meet the needs of the scam I
planned, and to bounce (not forward) this message to the
agora-business list, where I could deal with it as list-administrator.
The full headers of the message corroborate this story. My friend's
name is Angus Montgomery; he works as a programmer for a graphics and
games company called Beam International. If you examine lines 17-23
of the headers, you will find there the traces of Angus' involvement
in the execution of the scam.
In short there can be no serious doubt that I sent the message
identified in the Statement.
======================================================================
Evidence attached by the Caller:
<none>
======================================================================